IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i4p1601-d1338873.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of Peak Water Usage among Residential Consumers across Several Drinking Water Service Areas

Author

Listed:
  • Alex J. Garzón-Orduña

    (Unidad de Gestión de Aguas y Saneamiento, HMV Ingenieros, Bogotá 110231, Colombia
    School of Engineering, Department of Civil and Agricultural Engineering, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá 111321, Colombia)

  • Oscar E. Coronado-Hernández

    (Instituto de Hidráulica y Saneamiento Ambiental, Universidad de Cartagena, Cartagena 130001, Colombia)

  • Rafael O. Ortiz

    (School of Engineering, Department of Civil and Agricultural Engineering, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá 111321, Colombia)

  • Alfonso Arrieta-Pastrana

    (Instituto de Hidráulica y Saneamiento Ambiental, Universidad de Cartagena, Cartagena 130001, Colombia)

  • Vicente S. Fuertes-Miquel

    (Departamento de Ingeniería Hidráulica y Medio Ambiente, Universitat Politècnica de València, 46022 Valencia, Spain)

Abstract

Public drinking water service providers must comprehensively understand and effectively characterise user demands, especially during peak hours, which not only impact the maximum demand within the distribution network but also determine the dimensions of interior networks within buildings. Residential consumers show different consumption patterns based on socioeconomic factors, spatial location, climatic conditions and the consistency and quality of service delivered by public service providers. This study focused on assessing 1,317,584 users distributed across four distinct service areas in Bogotá, Colombia. To achieve this, a stratified random sampling of 1233 residential subscribers was conducted and 320 reference digital Y290 Aquabus micro-meters were installed to characterise the four service areas. The installations were grouped into sets of 320 users until the entire sample of 1233 subscribers was encompassed. The results demonstrated that the rational method provided the most accurate fit for estimating the probable maximum flow rates compared to the values measured and, consequently, is the most suitable method for application within the region of interest. However, whereas the Hunter Unal method displayed a reasonable fit, it tended to underestimate the size of internal networks within buildings. The remaining methods, such as the British, square root, simultaneity, Hunter, NTC 1500 Hunter and Chilean methods, did not yield significant adjustments and tended to overestimate the probable maximum flow rates as well as the internal networks within buildings. The results indicate that, depending on the method used to calculate the probable maximum flow or design flow of the internal network, there can be a deviation factor when compared to the actual peak flow measured (real maximum flow). This deviation factor ranges from 0.79 (calculated less than measured) to 3.77 (calculated greater than measured). Additionally, a sizing case study was conducted, which involved applying all methods to a scenario involving a residential user. This study aimed to determine the variation expected in the estimation of the diameter of the supply pipe to the internal network when using the flow results from different methods. This analysis serves to conclude the research.

Suggested Citation

  • Alex J. Garzón-Orduña & Oscar E. Coronado-Hernández & Rafael O. Ortiz & Alfonso Arrieta-Pastrana & Vicente S. Fuertes-Miquel, 2024. "Assessment of Peak Water Usage among Residential Consumers across Several Drinking Water Service Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-31, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:4:p:1601-:d:1338873
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/4/1601/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/4/1601/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:4:p:1601-:d:1338873. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.