IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i4p1564-d1338094.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Co-Production of Xylanase, Cellulase, and Pectinase through Agroindustrial Residue Valorization Using Solid-State Fermentation: A Techno-Economic Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Jazel Doménica Sosa-Martínez

    (Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Autónoma de Coahuila, Unidad Saltillo, Saltillo 25280, Coahuila, Mexico)

  • Lourdes Morales-Oyervides

    (Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Autónoma de Coahuila, Unidad Saltillo, Saltillo 25280, Coahuila, Mexico)

  • Julio Montañez

    (Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Autónoma de Coahuila, Unidad Saltillo, Saltillo 25280, Coahuila, Mexico)

  • Juan Carlos Contreras-Esquivel

    (Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Autónoma de Coahuila, Unidad Saltillo, Saltillo 25280, Coahuila, Mexico)

  • Nagamani Balagurusamy

    (Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Autónoma de Coahuila, Unidad Torreón, Torreón 27087, Coahuila, Mexico)

  • Suresh Kumar Gadi

    (Facultad de Ingeniería Mecánica y Eléctrica, Universidad Autónoma de Coahuila, Unidad Torreón, Torreón 27087, Coahuila, Mexico)

  • Ivan Salmerón

    (School of Chemical Science, Autonomous University of Chihuahua, Circuit 1, New University Campus, Chihuahua 31125, Chihuahua, Mexico)

Abstract

This work describes the evaluation of the solid-state fermentation (SSF) bioprocess utilizing brewery spent grain (BSG) and apple pomace (AP) as carbon sources and matrices for microorganism growth to produce xylanase, pectinase, and cellulase. The process was assessed at a larger scale by designing a packed column-type bioreactor equipped with sensors for monitoring critical parameters such as CO 2 concentration, humidity, and temperature. Then, process simulation was used to evaluate the techno-economic feasibility of the bioprocess at an industrial scale. The analysis centered on evaluating which formulation, primarily containing xylanase (scenario 1), pectinase (scenario 2), or cellulase (scenario 3), yielded the most promising results for advancing to the commercial stage. Additionally, a sensitivity analysis was conducted to explore the influence of variations in raw material costs and enzyme prices. The obtained results at a higher scale were within the expected results obtained under optimum conditions. Scenario 1 exhibited strong economic viability with further optimization potential (base case: 5000 kg/batch with an ROI of 37.59%, payback time of 2.66 years, IRR of 26.8%, and net present value of USD 7,325,537). The sensitivity analysis revealed that changes in enzyme prices, particularly xylanase, could significantly influence the process’s profitability. This study also demonstrated the potential for cost optimization by selecting a more cost-effective inoculum media and optimizing water usage to enhance process efficiency and sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Jazel Doménica Sosa-Martínez & Lourdes Morales-Oyervides & Julio Montañez & Juan Carlos Contreras-Esquivel & Nagamani Balagurusamy & Suresh Kumar Gadi & Ivan Salmerón, 2024. "Sustainable Co-Production of Xylanase, Cellulase, and Pectinase through Agroindustrial Residue Valorization Using Solid-State Fermentation: A Techno-Economic Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-19, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:4:p:1564-:d:1338094
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/4/1564/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/4/1564/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:4:p:1564-:d:1338094. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.