IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i4p1471-d1336342.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Addressing Climate Change through International Investment Agreements: Obstacles and Reform Options

Author

Listed:
  • Sheng Zhang

    (School of Law, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China)

  • Ni Li

    (School of Law, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China)

Abstract

The current international investment treaty network is not well suited to climate goals. The tension stems from the fact that “old generation” of international investment agreements were concluded before the widespread climate action and they were “climate neutral” or “climate blind”. This study explores the obstacles for international investment agreements and investment arbitration to tackle climate change issues, indicating the need for reform. Despite the fact that some states have begun to reform their international investment agreements in light of climate change, there are still many shortcomings to be addressed. The current international investment agreement regime should be reformed to incorporate climate change considerations for investment arbitration to contribute to climate change mitigation. According to the findings, updating investment treaties based on a climate-oriented model would be a viable option for states.

Suggested Citation

  • Sheng Zhang & Ni Li, 2024. "Addressing Climate Change through International Investment Agreements: Obstacles and Reform Options," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-17, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:4:p:1471-:d:1336342
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/4/1471/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/4/1471/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joshua Paine & Elizabeth Sheargold, 2023. "A Climate Change Carve-Out for Investment Treaties," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 26(2), pages 285-304.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:4:p:1471-:d:1336342. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.