IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i4p1460-d1336106.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Angle-Dependent XRF Analyses: Pros and Cons of a Novel Technique in the Field of Cultural Heritage

Author

Listed:
  • Jacopo Orsilli

    (Department of Material Science, University of Milano Bicocca, Via Roberto Cozzi 55, 20125 Milan, Italy)

  • Anna Galli

    (Department of Material Science, University of Milano Bicocca, Via Roberto Cozzi 55, 20125 Milan, Italy)

Abstract

In the cultural heritage field, non-invasive analyses are becoming more important as they avoid any sampling, allowing in situ measurements to be performed. XRF is one of the most common among those techniques, as it allows elemental speciation of the sample with a range that goes from F to U. However, the main limitation of this technique on cultural heritage objects is due to their intrinsic inhomogeneity, both lateral and in-depth. If MA-XRF has overcome the lateral inhomogeneity through the collection of multiple XRF spectra in different positions, it is more difficult to find an optimal way to perform in-depth analyses. Now, only confocal micro XRF allows for precise 3D analyses, as other techniques are limited to certain kinds of samples. In recent years, however, angle-resolved XRF has given promising results in the analysis of layered samples. In this study, we will review the information about this new analytical technique and its advantages and disadvantages in studying cultural heritage objects following our recent studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Jacopo Orsilli & Anna Galli, 2024. "Angle-Dependent XRF Analyses: Pros and Cons of a Novel Technique in the Field of Cultural Heritage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-18, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:4:p:1460-:d:1336106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/4/1460/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/4/1460/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:4:p:1460-:d:1336106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.