IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i3p1043-d1326427.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Passive Safety Assessment of Railroad Trains in Moose Herd Collision Scenarios

Author

Listed:
  • Shizhong Zhao

    (CCRC Qingdao Sifang Co., Ltd., Qingdao 266000, China)

  • Zhengsheng Hu

    (Key Laboratory of Traffic Safety on Track, Ministry of Education, School of Traffic & Transportation Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China)

  • Yangyang Yu

    (CCRC Qingdao Sifang Co., Ltd., Qingdao 266000, China
    Key Laboratory of Traffic Safety on Track, Ministry of Education, School of Traffic & Transportation Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China)

  • Gongxun Deng

    (Key Laboratory of Traffic Safety on Track, Ministry of Education, School of Traffic & Transportation Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China)

  • Min Deng

    (Key Laboratory of Traffic Safety on Track, Ministry of Education, School of Traffic & Transportation Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China)

Abstract

Moose herd–train collisions represent one of the potential hazards that railway operations must contend with, making the assessment of passive train safety in such scenarios a crucial concern. This study analyzes the responses of bullet trains colliding with moose herds and investigates the influence of various factors under these conditions. To achieve this goal, a multibody (MB) model was developed using the MADYMO platform. The displacement of the moose’s center of gravity (CG) was employed to assess the safety boundaries, while the relative positions between the wheels and rails were used to evaluate the risk of derailment. The findings revealed that the collision forces exhibited multi-peak characteristics that were subsequently transmitted to the wheel–rail contact system, resulting in disturbances in the relative positions of the wheels and rails. However, these disturbances did not reach a level that would induce train derailment. Furthermore, larger moose herds exhibited higher throw heights, although these heights remained within safe limits and did not pose a threat to overhead lines. The primary safety risk in moose–train collisions stemmed from secondary collisions involving moose that had fallen onto the tracks and oncoming trains. This study offers valuable insights for enhancing the operational safety of high-speed trains and safeguarding wildlife along railway corridors.

Suggested Citation

  • Shizhong Zhao & Zhengsheng Hu & Yangyang Yu & Gongxun Deng & Min Deng, 2024. "Passive Safety Assessment of Railroad Trains in Moose Herd Collision Scenarios," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-13, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:3:p:1043-:d:1326427
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/3/1043/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/3/1043/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:3:p:1043-:d:1326427. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.