IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i2p594-d1316192.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Survey of Antifungal in Surface- and Groundwater: A Portuguese Environmental Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Cristina De Mello-Sampayo

    (Laboratory of Neuroinflammation, Signaling and Neuroregeneration, Research Institute for Medicines (iMed.ULisboa), Faculty of Pharmacy, Universidade de Lisboa, 1649-003 Lisbon, Portugal)

  • Paula Viana

    (Portuguese Environmental Agency (APA), Rua da Murgueira, 9, Zambujal, Alfragide, 2610-124 Amadora, Portugal)

  • Ana Lopes

    (Portuguese Environmental Agency (APA), Rua da Murgueira, 9, Zambujal, Alfragide, 2610-124 Amadora, Portugal)

  • Rita Carvalho da Silva

    (Research Institute for Medicines (iMed.ULisboa), Faculty of Pharmacy, Universidade de Lisboa, 1649-003 Lisbon, Portugal
    Biosafety Unit, Gulbenkian Institute of Science, 2780-156 Oeiras, Portugal)

  • Rosário de Jesus

    (Portuguese Environmental Agency (APA), Rua da Murgueira, 9, Zambujal, Alfragide, 2610-124 Amadora, Portugal)

  • Georgina Sarmento

    (Analysis Laboratory, Instituto Superior Técnico, University of Lisbon, Av. Rovisco Pais, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Anabela Almeida

    (Vasco da Gama Research Centre (CIVG), Departamento de Ciências Veterinárias, Escola Universitária Vasco da Gama (EUVG), Campus Universitário de Lordemão, Av. José R. Sousa Fernandes 197, 3020-210 Coimbra, Portugal
    Coimbra Institute for Biomedical Imaging and Translational Research (CIBIT), University of Coimbra, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal)

  • Leonor Meisel

    (Laboratory of Systems Integration Pharmacology, Clinical and Regulatory Science, Research Institute for Medicines (iMed.ULisboa), Faculty of Pharmacy, Universidade de Lisboa, 1600-277 Lisbon, Portugal)

Abstract

Antifungals support modern medical and agricultural practices, and extensive screening environmental data are missing. This work aims to survey antifungals for medical and agricultural purposes in surface- and groundwater in Portugal. A passive sampling technique and a high-resolution chromatographic system were used. Antifungals applied in medical practice were not detected as only antifungals for agricultural purposes (fungicides). Thirty-nine different fungicide molecules were found; its detection frequency in surface- and groundwater was dominated by rabenzazole (61%, 92%) and ethoxyquin (54%, 77%); among the five fungicides with similar surface- and groundwater catching rates, ferimzone was the most polluting (54%, 54%); oxadixyl (61%), kresoxim-methyl (61%) and fenamidone (46%) were primarily designated surface water contaminants; for azoles, the occurrence in surface water ranged from a residual (10%) to a moderate detection rate for two compounds (31%—propiconazole and tebuconazole). Surprisingly, only 51% of detected fungicides are authorised. The frequently detected fungicides that are either not authorised (ethoxyquin and its impurity, furmecyclox, oxadixyl), without data in the EU (rabenzazole, ferimzone), or authorised at the national level (fenamidone), should be included in environmental monitoring programmes and followed as emerging (micro)contaminants. Policy makers should gather their efforts to allow the implementation of proper risk management and effective contamination control strategies to achieve Sustainable Development Goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Cristina De Mello-Sampayo & Paula Viana & Ana Lopes & Rita Carvalho da Silva & Rosário de Jesus & Georgina Sarmento & Anabela Almeida & Leonor Meisel, 2024. "Survey of Antifungal in Surface- and Groundwater: A Portuguese Environmental Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-17, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:2:p:594-:d:1316192
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/2/594/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/2/594/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:2:p:594-:d:1316192. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.