IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i21p9473-d1511225.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ecological Flow Assessment: Balancing Trout and Grayling Habitat Ecology and Hydroelectric Production

Author

Listed:
  • Raphaël Angeles

    (EcoEng SA, Place de la Gare 4, 2900 Porrentruy, Switzerland)

  • Patrick Della Croce

    (Division for Environmental Sciences, Mathematics, Psychology and Health Sciences, Franklin University Switzerland, 6924 Sorengo, Switzerland)

  • Federico Ferrario

    (EcoEng SA, Place de la Gare 4, 2900 Porrentruy, Switzerland)

  • Giovanni De Cesare

    (Platform of Hydraulic Constructions (PL-LCH), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland)

Abstract

In light of Switzerland’s 2050 energy goals, the nation aims to boost its domestic hydroelectric output, notably focusing on small-scale hydroelectric power plants. Concurrently, there is an effort to renovate hydroelectric plants to make them more environmentally friendly, emphasizing ecological flow regulation to improve river conditions. This study explores the application of a non-proportional flow allocation method to better assess both ecological and economic outcomes. Unlike traditional fixed or proportional flow methods, this approach allows for a more dynamic balance between hydropower generation and riverine ecosystem health. This study focuses on two key species, brown trout and grayling. In particular, this work highlighted that trout are better suited for low-flow conditions (Weighted Usable Area, WUA, peaks below 1 m 3 /s), while grayling require significantly higher flows (WUA peaks over 4.5 m 3 /s). This disparity in habitat preferences raises concerns about the current reliance on single-species models, emphasizing the need for multi-species ecological assessment in future studies. When applied to a small hydropower plant in the Swiss Jura, the non-proportional flow method resulted in an improvement of ecological conditions of at least 37.7%, which consequently led to a reduction of the hydroelectric production of at least 10%. Through strategic upgrades to the facility (e.g., by minimizing hydraulic losses, implementing more efficient turbines, or incorporating photovoltaic panels over water channels), it is possible to simultaneously enhance both energy output and environmental sustainability. These findings suggest that non-proportional flow allocation holds significant potential for broader use in sustainable hydropower management, providing a pathway toward meeting both energy production and ecological conservation goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Raphaël Angeles & Patrick Della Croce & Federico Ferrario & Giovanni De Cesare, 2024. "Ecological Flow Assessment: Balancing Trout and Grayling Habitat Ecology and Hydroelectric Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-19, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:21:p:9473-:d:1511225
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/21/9473/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/21/9473/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:21:p:9473-:d:1511225. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.