Author
Listed:
- Yuhui Weng
(College of Forestry and Agriculture, Stephen F. Austin State University, Nacogdoches, TX 75962, USA)
- Dean Coble
(BTG Timberland Investment Group, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA)
- Jason Grogan
(College of Forestry and Agriculture, Stephen F. Austin State University, Nacogdoches, TX 75962, USA)
- Chen Ding
(College of Forestry, Wildlife and Environment, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA)
- Xiongwei Lou
(College of Mathematics and Computer Science, Zhejiang A & F University, Hangzhou 311300, China)
Abstract
Efficiently quantifying stand density is crucial in sustainably managing mid-rotation loblolly pine ( Pinus taeda L.) plantations. While various stand density measures, including basal area (BA), stand density index (SDI), relative spacing (RS), and live crown length ratio (CR), are used, ambiguity persists among these measures: are they each biologically sound and are they on par with each other in terms of density management? These topics were investigated by examining the relationships between measures and stand age, between measures and tree growth, and between measures using data from numerous long-term permanent plots established in loblolly pine plantations in east Texas. A strong trend of increasing density with age was found for all the measures. The trend followed an asymptotic trajectory when density was expressed as BA, SDI, or RS, adhering to biological expectations, but the trend showed a gradual decrease for CR. Strong and biologically sound relationships between DBH periodic annual increment ( P A I D ) and BA or SDI were observed, suggesting that both measures match true DBH growth. However, P A I D linearly decreased with decreasing RS and with decreasing CR in a smooth curve, biasing from the biological expectation. Strong relationships existed between the measures, suggesting that these seemingly disparate measures are not independent of each other. Site index affected all investigated relationships in a manner of having higher densities at a given age or a greater P A I D at a given density for higher site index sites regardless of measures. The effects of initial planting density on the relationships were mostly negligible, having no practical significance, with few exceptions (the relationships of SDI–age, RS–age, and CR–RS). Among the measures evaluated, our results advocate for the use of B A to regulate mid-rotation loblolly pine plantation density such as determining the approximate biological timing for thinning in the Western Gulf region due to its biological soundness, ease of measurement, and feasibility of incorporating effects of site quality and planting density.
Suggested Citation
Yuhui Weng & Dean Coble & Jason Grogan & Chen Ding & Xiongwei Lou, 2024.
"Evaluating Stand Density Measures for Regulating Mid-Rotation Loblolly Pine Plantation Density in the Western Gulf, USA,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-15, October.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:21:p:9452-:d:1510690
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:21:p:9452-:d:1510690. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.