IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i1p448-d1313093.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Incinerator Performance and Policy Framework for Effective Waste Management and Energy Recovery: A Case Study of South Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Younghyun Kwon

    (National Institute of Environmental Research (NIER), Hwangyeong-ro 42, Incheon 22689, Republic of Korea)

  • Suyoung Lee

    (National Institute of Environmental Research (NIER), Hwangyeong-ro 42, Incheon 22689, Republic of Korea)

  • Jisu Bae

    (National Institute of Environmental Research (NIER), Hwangyeong-ro 42, Incheon 22689, Republic of Korea)

  • Sein Park

    (National Institute of Environmental Research (NIER), Hwangyeong-ro 42, Incheon 22689, Republic of Korea)

  • Heesung Moon

    (Environmental Health Technology Institute (EHTI), Heojun-ro, Seoul 20226, Republic of Korea)

  • Taewoo Lee

    (National Institute of Environmental Research (NIER), Hwangyeong-ro 42, Incheon 22689, Republic of Korea)

  • Kyuyeon Kim

    (National Institute of Environmental Research (NIER), Hwangyeong-ro 42, Incheon 22689, Republic of Korea)

  • Jungu Kang

    (National Institute of Environmental Research (NIER), Hwangyeong-ro 42, Incheon 22689, Republic of Korea)

  • Taewan Jeon

    (National Institute of Environmental Research (NIER), Hwangyeong-ro 42, Incheon 22689, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

Waste incineration is a crucial component of waste management as it is the final stage of circular utilization and the initial phase of disposal. Effective waste management prioritizes energy recovery from waste and substantial waste volume reduction while committing to minimizing air pollutant emissions, particularly nitrogen oxides (NOx). This study involves an in-depth analysis of operational data from 44 incineration facilities in South Korea spanning 5 years, supplemented by empirical measurements from 14 sites. This study aimed to assess three key aspects of these incineration facilities: (1) waste volume reduction characteristics, (2) energy recovery capabilities, and (3) NOx emission reduction performance. We examined how these elements interact within the policy framework governing incinerator management in South Korea. Quantitatively, incinerating 100 tons of municipal waste resulted in a gain of 338.7 m 3 in landfill capacity and recovery of 637.5 GJ of energy in the form of heat or electricity. Notably, South Korean incineration facilities significantly extend the lifespan of landfill sites, aligning closely with the objectives of the South Korean Ministry of Environment’s “No More Direct Landfilling of Household Waste Policy”. This positive outcome is further reinforced by the “Incineration Tax Reduction Policy”, which incentivizes active efforts toward energy recovery during incineration. Our study provides decision-makers with valuable insights for achieving a harmonious equilibrium between environmental sustainability and resource utilization, thereby contributing to the continuous improvement of policies aimed at South Korea’s vision of achieving a circular economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Younghyun Kwon & Suyoung Lee & Jisu Bae & Sein Park & Heesung Moon & Taewoo Lee & Kyuyeon Kim & Jungu Kang & Taewan Jeon, 2024. "Evaluation of Incinerator Performance and Policy Framework for Effective Waste Management and Energy Recovery: A Case Study of South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-14, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:1:p:448-:d:1313093
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/1/448/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/1/448/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:1:p:448-:d:1313093. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.