IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i15p6423-d1443930.html

Enhancing Forest Site Classification in Northwest Portugal: A Geostatistical Approach Employing Cokriging

Author

Listed:
  • Barbara Pavani-Biju

    (Department of Geosciences, Environment and Land Planning, University of Porto, Rua Campo Alegre, 687, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal
    Earth Sciences Institute (ICT), Pole of the FCUP, University of Porto, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal
    Forest Research Centre, School of Agriculture, University of Lisbon, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-017 Lisbon, Portugal)

  • José G. Borges

    (Forest Research Centre, Associate Laboratory TERRA, School of Agriculture, University of Lisbon, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-017 Lisbon, Portugal)

  • Susete Marques

    (Forest Research Centre, Associate Laboratory TERRA, School of Agriculture, University of Lisbon, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-017 Lisbon, Portugal)

  • Ana C. Teodoro

    (Department of Geosciences, Environment and Land Planning, University of Porto, Rua Campo Alegre, 687, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal
    Earth Sciences Institute (ICT), Pole of the FCUP, University of Porto, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal)

Abstract

Forest managers need inventory data and information to address sustainability concerns over extended temporal horizons. In situ information is usually derived from field data and computed using appropriate equations. Nonetheless, fieldwork is time-consuming and costly. Thus, new technologies like Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) have emerged as an alternative method for forest assessment. In this study, we evaluated the accuracy of geostatistical methods in predicting the Site Index (SI) using LiDAR metrics as auxiliary variables. Since primary variables, which were obtained from forestry inventory data, were used to calculate the SI, secondary variables obtained from LiDAR surveying were considered and multivariate kriging techniques were tested. The ordinary cokriging (CK) method outperformed the simple cokriging (SK) and Inverse Distance Weighted (IDW) methods, which was interpolated using only the primary variable. Aside from having fewer SI sample points, CK was proven to be a trustworthy interpolation method, minimizing interpolation errors due to the highly correlated auxiliary variables, highlighting the significance of the data’s spatial structure and autocorrelation in predicting forest stand attributes, such as the SI. CK increased the SI prediction accuracy by 36.6% for eucalyptus, 62% for maritime pine, 72% for pedunculate oak, and 43% for cork oak compared to IDW, outperforming this interpolation approach. Although cokriging modeling is challenging, it is an appealing alternative to non-spatial statistics for improving forest management sustainability since the results are unbiased and trustworthy, making the effort worthwhile when dense secondary variables are available.

Suggested Citation

  • Barbara Pavani-Biju & José G. Borges & Susete Marques & Ana C. Teodoro, 2024. "Enhancing Forest Site Classification in Northwest Portugal: A Geostatistical Approach Employing Cokriging," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-21, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:15:p:6423-:d:1443930
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/15/6423/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/15/6423/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marques, Marlene & Juerges, Nataly & Borges, José G., 2020. "Appraisal framework for actor interest and power analysis in forest management - Insights from Northern Portugal," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Juerges, Nataly & Arts, Bas & Masiero, Mauro & Hoogstra-Klein, Marjanke & Borges, José G. & Brodrechtova, Yvonne & Brukas, Vilis & Canadas, Maria João & Carvalho, Pedro Ochôa & Corradini, Giulia & Cor, 2021. "Power analysis as a tool to analyse trade-offs between ecosystem services in forest management: A case study from nine European countries," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    2. Marlene Marques & Keith M. Reynolds & Susete Marques & Marco Marto & Steve Paplanus & José G. Borges, 2021. "A Participatory and Spatial Multicriteria Decision Approach to Prioritize the Allocation of Ecosystem Services to Management Units," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-22, July.
    3. Campos Fernandes, C. & Valente, S. & Figueiredo, E. & Polido, A., 2025. "Stakeholder and social network analysis for understanding forest (fires) management – A contribution based on a systematic literature review," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    4. Hoeben, Annechien Dirkje & Lautrup, Marie & Willig, Julius & García-Jácome, Sandra P. & Jankovský, Martin & Toppinen, Anne & Vuletić, Dijana & Peltoniemi, Mikko & Stern, Tobias, 2025. "Stakeholder views of adaptation measures to improve climate resilience: Case study evidence from European wood value chains," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    5. Mónica de Castro-Pardo & João C. Azevedo, 2021. "A Goal Programming Model to Guide Decision-Making Processes towards Conservation Consensuses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-25, February.
    6. Brodrechtova, Yvonne, 2024. "Assessing actor power in the trade-offs between ecosystem services affecting forest management – A case study from Central Slovakia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    7. Brigite Botequim & Miguel N. Bugalho & Ana Raquel Rodrigues & Susete Marques & Marco Marto & José G. Borges, 2021. "Combining Tree Species Composition and Understory Coverage Indicators with Optimization Techniques to Address Concerns with Landscape-Level Biodiversity," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-26, January.
    8. Mengistie Kindu & Logan Robert Bingham & José G. Borges & Susete Marques & Olha Nahorna & Jeannette Eggers & Thomas Knoke, 2022. "Opportunity Costs of In Situ Carbon Storage Derived by Multiple-Objective Stand-Level Optimization—Results from Case Studies in Portugal and Germany," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-12, November.
    9. Sintayehu Alemayehu & Getachew Tegegne & Sintayehu W. Dejene & Lidya Tesfaye & Numery Abdulhamid & Evan Girvetz, 2025. "Harnessing Livestock Water and Pasture Monitoring and Early Warning Systems for Anticipatory Action to Strengthen Resilience of Pastoral Communities in Ethiopia: A Qualitative Multi-Stakeholder Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-18, May.
    10. Ferreira, Carla & Pinto, Lígia Costa & Valente, Marieta, 2024. "Forest fire causes and prevention strategies in Portugal: Insights from stakeholder focus groups," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    11. Garcia, Gino & Mann, Carsten & Cremer, Tobias, 2025. "An integrated conflict analysis approach for the sustainable supply of Forest Ecosystem Services in Germany - the case of forest-based biofuel production," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    12. Wang, Weiye & Zhai, Daye & Li, Xinyang & Fang, Haowen & Yang, Yuanyuan, 2024. "Conflicts in mangrove protected areas through the actor-centred power framework - Insights from China," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    13. Kimengsi, Jude Ndzifon & Charmakar, Shambhu & Balgah, Roland Azibo & Giessen, Lukas, 2025. "“Missing” power features in the Actor-Centered-Power framework: Systematic review and empirical insights from Central Africa's Dja and Faro Landscapes," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    14. Opoku, Patrick & Nsor, Collins Ayine & Acquah, Emmanuel & Akoto, Dorothy Asare & Weber, Norbert, 2025. "Actor and power analysis in urban forests and green spaces management. Insights from the Garden City of West Africa," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    15. Pelyukh, Oksana & Lavnyy, Vasyl & Paletto, Alessandro & Troxler, David, 2021. "Stakeholder analysis in sustainable forest management: An application in the Yavoriv region (Ukraine)," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    16. Arnould, Maxence & Morel, Laure & Fournier, Meriem, 2021. "Developing the persona method to increase the commitment of non-industrial private forest owners in French forest policy priorities," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:15:p:6423-:d:1443930. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.