IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i15p6423-d1443930.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhancing Forest Site Classification in Northwest Portugal: A Geostatistical Approach Employing Cokriging

Author

Listed:
  • Barbara Pavani-Biju

    (Department of Geosciences, Environment and Land Planning, University of Porto, Rua Campo Alegre, 687, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal
    Earth Sciences Institute (ICT), Pole of the FCUP, University of Porto, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal
    Forest Research Centre, School of Agriculture, University of Lisbon, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-017 Lisbon, Portugal)

  • José G. Borges

    (Forest Research Centre, Associate Laboratory TERRA, School of Agriculture, University of Lisbon, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-017 Lisbon, Portugal)

  • Susete Marques

    (Forest Research Centre, Associate Laboratory TERRA, School of Agriculture, University of Lisbon, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-017 Lisbon, Portugal)

  • Ana C. Teodoro

    (Department of Geosciences, Environment and Land Planning, University of Porto, Rua Campo Alegre, 687, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal
    Earth Sciences Institute (ICT), Pole of the FCUP, University of Porto, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal)

Abstract

Forest managers need inventory data and information to address sustainability concerns over extended temporal horizons. In situ information is usually derived from field data and computed using appropriate equations. Nonetheless, fieldwork is time-consuming and costly. Thus, new technologies like Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) have emerged as an alternative method for forest assessment. In this study, we evaluated the accuracy of geostatistical methods in predicting the Site Index (SI) using LiDAR metrics as auxiliary variables. Since primary variables, which were obtained from forestry inventory data, were used to calculate the SI, secondary variables obtained from LiDAR surveying were considered and multivariate kriging techniques were tested. The ordinary cokriging (CK) method outperformed the simple cokriging (SK) and Inverse Distance Weighted (IDW) methods, which was interpolated using only the primary variable. Aside from having fewer SI sample points, CK was proven to be a trustworthy interpolation method, minimizing interpolation errors due to the highly correlated auxiliary variables, highlighting the significance of the data’s spatial structure and autocorrelation in predicting forest stand attributes, such as the SI. CK increased the SI prediction accuracy by 36.6% for eucalyptus, 62% for maritime pine, 72% for pedunculate oak, and 43% for cork oak compared to IDW, outperforming this interpolation approach. Although cokriging modeling is challenging, it is an appealing alternative to non-spatial statistics for improving forest management sustainability since the results are unbiased and trustworthy, making the effort worthwhile when dense secondary variables are available.

Suggested Citation

  • Barbara Pavani-Biju & José G. Borges & Susete Marques & Ana C. Teodoro, 2024. "Enhancing Forest Site Classification in Northwest Portugal: A Geostatistical Approach Employing Cokriging," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-21, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:15:p:6423-:d:1443930
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/15/6423/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/15/6423/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:15:p:6423-:d:1443930. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.