IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i12p4987-d1412789.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Physical Robots in Education: A Systematic Review Based on the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Huayi Wang

    (Department of Education, Kyungil University, Gyeongsan 38428, Republic of Korea
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Ningfeng Luo

    (Department of Human Sciences, Assumption University, Bangkok 10240, Thailand
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Tong Zhou

    (Department of Physical Education, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea)

  • Shuai Yang

    (Department of Education, Kyungil University, Gyeongsan 38428, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

Driven by the wave of artificial intelligence, the educational practice and application of robots have become increasingly common. Despite extensive coverage in the literature on various aspects of educational robots, there are still unexplored avenues, particularly regarding robotic support, robotic personality, and challenges in their applications. This study presented a systematic review of high-quality empirical research on the use of physical robots in educational settings. A total of 92 relevant papers from the Web of Science database were analyzed. Employing the technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) framework, we investigated research questions across seven components, including the learning domain, teaching strategy, robot types, learning results, problems with using robots, robotic support, and robotic personality. The findings revealed that robots are most prevalently employed in language learning applications. When opting for teaching strategies, educators tend to favor those that incorporate physical interaction. Concurrently, humanoid robots emerge as the preferred choice among many. These robots, in human–robot interaction scenarios, often exhibit an agreeable personality. In terms of evaluating learning results, cognitive aspects like thinking, creativity, self-regulation, and inquiry ability are especially emphasized. Such results are frequently influenced by the informational and emotional support provided by robots. Nonetheless, challenges encountered by teachers, learners, and robots in this process are not to be overlooked. The findings of this study contributed to future applications of robotics in education.

Suggested Citation

  • Huayi Wang & Ningfeng Luo & Tong Zhou & Shuai Yang, 2024. "Physical Robots in Education: A Systematic Review Based on the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-24, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:12:p:4987-:d:1412789
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/12/4987/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/12/4987/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:12:p:4987-:d:1412789. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.