IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i11p4628-d1404844.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Minimum Dietary Level and Mix Ratio of Krill Meal and Fish Meal to Elicit Feed Intake and Growth Performance in Juvenile Penaeus vannamei

Author

Listed:
  • Alberto J. P. Nunes

    (LABOMAR—Instituto de Ciências do Mar, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Avenida da Abolição, 3207-Meireles, Fortaleza 60165-081, Brazil)

  • Jordana Sampaio Leite

    (LABOMAR—Instituto de Ciências do Mar, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Avenida da Abolição, 3207-Meireles, Fortaleza 60165-081, Brazil)

  • Caio Gabriel Dantas Gomes

    (LABOMAR—Instituto de Ciências do Mar, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Avenida da Abolição, 3207-Meireles, Fortaleza 60165-081, Brazil)

  • Ragnhild Dragøy

    (Aker BioMarine Feed Ingredients AS, Oksenøyveien 10, 1366 Lysaker, Norway)

  • Lena Burri

    (Aker BioMarine Feed Ingredients AS, Oksenøyveien 10, 1366 Lysaker, Norway)

Abstract

Shrimp feeds depend on high levels of digestible protein and essential amino acids, which can be sourced from various commercially available feed ingredients. Marine proteins can be used to partially fulfill the requirements of these and other important nutrients. Their utilization is further influenced by their palatability and growth-promoting effect. However, marine ingredients can significantly drive costs in feed formulation depending on the type and dietary inclusion level. This study aimed to determine the minimum dietary level of fish meal (FML) and krill meal (KRM) and their mix ratio to elicit feed intake and growth performance in juvenile Penaeus vannamei . Ten diets were formulated with graded FML (90, 60, 30 g kg −1 ) in combination with 15, 30, and 45 g kg −1 KRM and a control diet with 120 g kg −1 FML. Shrimp (1.28 ± 0.08 g body weight, BW) were stocked in seventy 1-m 3 tanks (135 animals m −2 ), and after 88 days, their growth performance was determined. Feed preference was assessed through two-by-two comparisons in twenty 0.5 m 3 tanks over four weeks. No significant differences in survival (93.9 ± 4.5%), gained yield (1235 ± 92 g m −2 ), and feed conversion ratio (1.47 ± 0.09) were observed. Diets with 60 g kg −1 FML led to faster growth and higher feed intake than 30, 90, and 120 g kg −1 FML. Shrimp on 30 g kg −1 FML diets had the lowest BW, especially with 30–15 (FML-KRM) and 30–30 diets. Diets with 90 g kg −1 FML outperformed 30 g kg −1 FML. The control diet delivered a higher shrimp BW than diets 30–15 and 30–30, showing similar results to other diets except 60–15. Feed preference was influenced by KRM inclusion, with 15 g kg −1 KRM resulting in higher apparent feed intake than 30 and 45 g kg −1 . The findings indicate that FML can be effectively reduced by up to 75% when combined with lower levels of KRM. This corresponds with the industry’s ongoing trend to achieve greater sustainability and cost efficiency through the reduced utilization of critical resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Alberto J. P. Nunes & Jordana Sampaio Leite & Caio Gabriel Dantas Gomes & Ragnhild Dragøy & Lena Burri, 2024. "The Minimum Dietary Level and Mix Ratio of Krill Meal and Fish Meal to Elicit Feed Intake and Growth Performance in Juvenile Penaeus vannamei," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-15, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:11:p:4628-:d:1404844
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/11/4628/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/11/4628/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:11:p:4628-:d:1404844. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.