Author
Listed:
- Adriano Bressane
(São Paulo State University, Instituto of Science and Technology, São José dos Campos 15054-000, SP, Brazil
Graduate Program in Civil and Environmental Engineering, São Paulo State University, Bauru 17033-360, SP, Brazil)
- Ana Júlia da Silva Garcia
(Graduate Program in Civil and Environmental Engineering, São Paulo State University, Bauru 17033-360, SP, Brazil)
- Marcos Vinícius de Castro
(Graduate Program in Civil and Environmental Engineering, São Paulo State University, Bauru 17033-360, SP, Brazil)
- Stefano Donatelli Xerfan
(São Paulo State University, Instituto of Science and Technology, São José dos Campos 15054-000, SP, Brazil)
- Graziele Ruas
(Graduate Program in Civil and Environmental Engineering, São Paulo State University, Bauru 17033-360, SP, Brazil
São Paulo State University, Engineering School, Bauru 17033-360, SP, Brazil)
- Rogério Galante Negri
(São Paulo State University, Instituto of Science and Technology, São José dos Campos 15054-000, SP, Brazil)
Abstract
Statement of Problem : Environmental engineering confronts complex challenges characterized by significant uncertainties. Traditional modeling methods often fail to effectively address these uncertainties. As a promising direction, this study explores fuzzy machine learning (ML) as an underutilized alternative. Research Question : Although the potential of fuzzy logic is widely acknowledged, can its capabilities truly enhance environmental engineering applications? Purpose : This research aims to deepen the understanding of the role and significance of fuzzy logic in managing uncertainty within environmental engineering applications. The objective is to contribute to both theoretical insights and practical implementations in this domain. Method : This research performs a systematic review carried out in alignment with PRISMA guidelines, encompassing 27 earlier studies that compare fuzzy ML with other methods across a variety of applications within the field of environmental engineering. Results : The findings demonstrate how fuzzy-based models consistently outperform traditional methods in scenarios marked by uncertainty. The originality of this research lies in its systematic comparison and the identification of fuzzy logic’s transparent, interpretable nature as particularly suited for environmental engineering challenges. This approach provides a new perspective on integrating fuzzy logic into environmental engineering, emphasizing its capability to offer more adaptable and resilient solutions. Conclusions : The analysis reveals that fuzzy-based models significantly excel in managing uncertainty compared to other methods. However, the study advocates for a case-by-case evaluation rather than a blanket replacement of traditional methods with fuzzy models. This approach encourages optimal selection based on specific project needs. Practical Implications : Our findings offer actionable insights for researchers and engineers, highlighting the transparent and interpretable nature of fuzzy models, along with their superior ability to handle uncertainties. Such attributes position fuzzy logic as a promising alternative in environmental engineering applications. Moreover, policymakers can leverage the reliability of fuzzy logic in developing ML-aided sustainable policies, thereby enhancing decision-making processes in environmental management.
Suggested Citation
Adriano Bressane & Ana Júlia da Silva Garcia & Marcos Vinícius de Castro & Stefano Donatelli Xerfan & Graziele Ruas & Rogério Galante Negri, 2024.
"Fuzzy Machine Learning Applications in Environmental Engineering: Does the Ability to Deal with Uncertainty Really Matter?,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-18, May.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:11:p:4525-:d:1402492
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:11:p:4525-:d:1402492. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.