IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i10p4304-d1398041.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Geomechanical Response Characteristics of Different Sedimentary Hydrodynamic Cycles—Exampled by Xujiahe Formation of Upper Triassic, Western Sichuan Basin

Author

Listed:
  • Qiqiang Ren

    (Institute of Sedimentary Geology, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China)

  • Lifei Li

    (Institute of Sedimentary Geology, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China)

  • Laixing Cai

    (Institute of Sedimentary Geology, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China)

  • Jianwei Feng

    (School of Resources and Geosciences, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221018, China)

  • Mengping Li

    (College of Energy, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China)

  • Xingjian Wang

    (State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China)

Abstract

This study delves into the geomechanical responses of different sedimentary hydrodynamic cycles in deep tight sandstone formations. Employing core observation and thin section analysis, we quantitatively identified and characterized bedding planes, sedimentary microfacies, and tectonic fractures. Then, the intricate relationships between various architectural interfaces and geomechanical parameters were elucidated. Subsequently, utilizing finite element numerical simulation software, in situ stress and fracture parameters were derived. By identifying a fracture facies zone correlated with the sedimentary hydrodynamic cycle and production data, our findings unveil several key insights: (1) Geomechanical parameters (Young’s modulus, Poisson’s ratio, brittleness index) exhibited noteworthy variations within the T 3 x 2−5 sand group, indicative of weak elasticity and robust plasticity. (2) The effective distance, influenced by diverse reservoir architecture interfaces, displayed variability, with each transition between peak-valley-peak or valley-peak-valley pinpointed as a distinct sedimentary hydrodynamic cycle. (3) In environments characterized by strong sedimentary hydrodynamics (between two level 3 architecture interfaces), fractures with larger strike angles and lower dip angles were observed to be more prevalent. (4) Three significant fracture faces—level I, level II, and level III—were discerned within the study area. Notably, reservoirs associated with level III exhibited characteristics suggestive of medium porosity and permeability, indicative of a gas layer. By thoroughly understanding the geomechanical response characteristics of formations such as the Xujiahe Formation, it is possible to guide the exploration and development of energy resources such as oil and natural gas. This helps to improve the efficiency and safety of resource extraction, promoting the sustainable utilization of energy.

Suggested Citation

  • Qiqiang Ren & Lifei Li & Laixing Cai & Jianwei Feng & Mengping Li & Xingjian Wang, 2024. "Geomechanical Response Characteristics of Different Sedimentary Hydrodynamic Cycles—Exampled by Xujiahe Formation of Upper Triassic, Western Sichuan Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-26, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:10:p:4304-:d:1398041
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/10/4304/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/10/4304/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:10:p:4304-:d:1398041. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.