IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i9p7128-d1131670.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Methodological Literature Review of Acoustic Wildlife Monitoring Using Artificial Intelligence Tools and Techniques

Author

Listed:
  • Sandhya Sharma

    (The Department of Engineering, Muroran Institute of Technology, Muroran 050-0071, Japan)

  • Kazuhiko Sato

    (The Department of Engineering, Muroran Institute of Technology, Muroran 050-0071, Japan)

  • Bishnu Prasad Gautam

    (The Department of Economic Informatics, Kanazawa Gakuin University, Kanazawa 920-1392, Japan)

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has become a significantly growing field in the environmental sector due to its ability to solve problems, make decisions, and recognize patterns. The significance of AI in wildlife acoustic monitoring is particularly important because of the vast amounts of data that are available in this field, which can be leveraged for computer vision and interpretation. Despite the increasing use of AI in wildlife ecology, its future in acoustic wildlife monitoring remains uncertain. To assess its potential and identify future needs, a scientific literature review was conducted on 54 works published between 2015 and March 2022. The results of the review showed a significant rise in the utilization of AI techniques in wildlife acoustic monitoring over this period, with birds (N = 26) gaining the most popularity, followed by mammals (N = 12). The most commonly used AI algorithm in this field was Convolutional Neural Network, which was found to be more accurate and beneficial than previous categorization methods in acoustic wildlife monitoring. This highlights the potential for AI to play a crucial role in advancing our understanding of wildlife populations and ecosystems. However, the results also show that there are still gaps in our understanding of the use of AI in wildlife acoustic monitoring. Further examination of previously used AI algorithms in bioacoustics research can help researchers better understand patterns and identify areas for improvement in autonomous wildlife monitoring. In conclusion, the use of AI in wildlife acoustic monitoring is a rapidly growing field with a lot of potential. While significant progress has been made in recent years, there is still much to be done to fully realize the potential of AI in this field. Further research is needed to better understand the limitations and opportunities of AI in wildlife acoustic monitoring, and to develop new algorithms that can improve the accuracy and usefulness of this technology.

Suggested Citation

  • Sandhya Sharma & Kazuhiko Sato & Bishnu Prasad Gautam, 2023. "A Methodological Literature Review of Acoustic Wildlife Monitoring Using Artificial Intelligence Tools and Techniques," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-20, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:7128-:d:1131670
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/9/7128/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/9/7128/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hjalmar K Turesson & Sidarta Ribeiro & Danillo R Pereira & João P Papa & Victor Hugo C de Albuquerque, 2016. "Machine Learning Algorithms for Automatic Classification of Marmoset Vocalizations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(9), pages 1-14, September.
    2. Oisin Mac Aodha & Rory Gibb & Kate E Barlow & Ella Browning & Michael Firman & Robin Freeman & Briana Harder & Libby Kinsey & Gary R Mead & Stuart E Newson & Ivan Pandourski & Stuart Parsons & Jon Rus, 2018. "Bat detective—Deep learning tools for bat acoustic signal detection," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-19, March.
    3. Ivan Braga Campos & Todd J Landers & Kate D Lee & William George Lee & Megan R Friesen & Anne C Gaskett & Louis Ranjard, 2019. "Assemblage of Focal Species Recognizers—AFSR: A technique for decreasing false indications of presence from acoustic automatic identification in a multiple species context," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(12), pages 1-14, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maryam Lotfian & Jens Ingensand & Maria Antonia Brovelli, 2021. "The Partnership of Citizen Science and Machine Learning: Benefits, Risks, and Future Challenges for Engagement, Data Collection, and Data Quality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Devis Tuia & Benjamin Kellenberger & Sara Beery & Blair R. Costelloe & Silvia Zuffi & Benjamin Risse & Alexander Mathis & Mackenzie W. Mathis & Frank Langevelde & Tilo Burghardt & Roland Kays & Holger, 2022. "Perspectives in machine learning for wildlife conservation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:7128-:d:1131670. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.