IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i7p6045-d1112630.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Azolla Biofertilizer Is an Effective Replacement for Urea Fertilizer in Vegetable Crops

Author

Listed:
  • Aisha Jama

    (Department of Soil & Crop Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA
    TUMI Genomics, LLC, Fort Collins, CO 80524, USA)

  • Dwi P. Widiastuti

    (Department of Soil & Crop Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA
    National Research and Innovation Agency, Jakarta Pusat 10340, Indonesia)

  • Sutarman Gafur

    (Faculty of Agriculture, Tanjungpura University, Pontianak 78124, Indonesia)

  • Jessica G. Davis

    (Department of Soil & Crop Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA)

Abstract

Azolla spp. is a water fern that hosts Anabaena azolla , an N-fixing cyanobacterium, in its dorsal leaf cavities. Azolla occurs naturally in freshwater bodies in warm-temperate and tropical regions, and they have commonly been grown in rice paddies as a living fertilizer, providing N to the rice crop. We evaluated the potential use of Azolla harvested from freshwater bodies and applied as a biofertilizer to dryland vegetable crops. Two-thirds of the greenhouse gas emissions from crop production is attributed to N fertilizer, including fossil fuels used in fertilizer production and transportation. Azolla grown in on-farm ponds could remove CO 2 from the atmosphere and minimize the use of fossil fuels in fertilizer production and transport. A 140-d laboratory incubation was used to compare the N mineralization of Azolla biofertilizer with compost and cyanobacterial biofertilizer treatments. Azolla treatments had the greatest N availability at the end of the incubation (73.0%), with compost demonstrating the least N availability (15.5%), and the cyanobacterial biofertilizers moderate in N release (31.6%). A greenhouse study evaluated the N uptake and yield of kale ( Brassica oleracea ) receiving Azolla biofertilizer compared to urea and organic fertilizers. The nitrogen uptake by kale followed the same pattern as in the incubation study, with the Azolla treatments highest among the organic fertilizers, and urea the greatest overall. Compost yielded better than the control but was the lowest yielding among the fertilizer treatments. Finally, we compared the agronomic effect of Azolla biofertilizer with urea and manure applied at the same N rates to spinach ( Amaranthus cruentus ) and radish ( Raphanus sativus) crops grown in the field on alluvial and peat soils. Fertilizer treatments affected the spinach yield at both locations but did not affect the radish yield. The manure treatment resulted in the highest spinach yields (18–27 t ha −1 ), and the Azolla treatment applied at the same N rate as the manure yielded the same as the manure treatment on the peat soil and had the highest leaf and branch numbers. Azolla shows promise as a biofertilizer for dryland vegetable crops; however, an economic feasibility analysis is needed prior to encouraging the widespread adoption of on-farm Azolla production and use.

Suggested Citation

  • Aisha Jama & Dwi P. Widiastuti & Sutarman Gafur & Jessica G. Davis, 2023. "Azolla Biofertilizer Is an Effective Replacement for Urea Fertilizer in Vegetable Crops," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-20, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:7:p:6045-:d:1112630
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/7/6045/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/7/6045/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mohd Naqib Azfar Mohd Roslan & Abentin Estim & Balu Alagar Venmathi Maran & Saleem Mustafa, 2021. "Effects of Aquatic Plants on Nutrient Concentration in Water and Growth Performance of Fantail Goldfish in an Aquaculture System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-13, October.
    2. Sathish Sundararaman & Ponnusamy Senthil Kumar & Prabu Deivasigamani & Aravind Kumar Jagadeesan & Marshiana Devaerakkam & Abdulrahman Al-Hashimi & Dongjin Choi, 2021. "Assessing the Plant Phytoremediation Efficacy for Azolla filiculoides in the Treatment of Textile Effluent and Redemption of Congo Red Dye onto Azolla Biomass," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-20, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Deivasigamani Prabu & Ponnusamy Senthil Kumar & Sravya Indraganti & Sundararaman Sathish & Jagadeesan Aravind Kumar & Kabali Vijai Anand, 2022. "One-Step Fabrication of Amino-Functionalized Fe 3 O 4 @SiO 2 Core-Shell Magnetic Nanoparticles as a Potential Novel Platform for Removal of Cadmium (II) from Aqueous Solution," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-21, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:7:p:6045-:d:1112630. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.