IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i6p5314-d1099599.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Chemical Footprint as an Indicator of Health Impacts: The Case of Dioxins and Furans in Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Biagio Fernando Giannetti

    (Graduation Program on Production Engineering, Paulista University, São Paulo 04026-002, Brazil)

  • Fábio Sevegnani

    (Graduation Program on Production Engineering, Paulista University, São Paulo 04026-002, Brazil)

  • Feni Agostinho

    (Graduation Program on Production Engineering, Paulista University, São Paulo 04026-002, Brazil)

  • Cecília M. V. B. Almeida

    (Graduation Program on Production Engineering, Paulista University, São Paulo 04026-002, Brazil)

  • Pedro Henrique Bolanho Simões

    (Lisam EcoAdvisor Systems, São Paulo 05319-000, Brazil)

  • Gengyuan Liu

    (State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
    Beijing Engineering Research Center for Watershed Environmental Restoration and Integrated Ecological Regulation, Beijing 100875, China)

Abstract

Humans are exposed to several chemical substances during their regular daily activities that can be harmful even in low quantities. Accounting for the mass of a given released chemical may not be appropriate for the assessment of its toxicological impact. To overcome the lack of a systemic perspective of mass-based assessments, methods such as the chemical footprint (ChF) are an alternative to account for a given chemical’s environmental and human toxicological impacts, a task that is considered essential in order to achieve the Agenda 2030 for sustainability. Among others, persistent organic pollutants (POP) should receive attention due to their high potential impact. Using the USEtox model to estimate indicators of human health impact, this study proposes an approach to calculate ChF for dioxins and furans and applies it to Brazil as a case study. The USEtox model quantifies human health impacts from the characterization of factors of a given chemical. Results show that ChF for dioxins and furans is approximately 620 DALY, representing a potential loss of 620 years of life in the Brazilian population. Social costs related to dioxins and furans emissions achieved USD 30 million, translating into monetary values not found in the existing literature. Besides highlighting the impacts of chemical emissions on the Brazilian population, this work contributes to the advances in methods for quantifying more appropriately such impacts beyond the exclusive use of mass units, in turn supporting sustainability-related public policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Biagio Fernando Giannetti & Fábio Sevegnani & Feni Agostinho & Cecília M. V. B. Almeida & Pedro Henrique Bolanho Simões & Gengyuan Liu, 2023. "Chemical Footprint as an Indicator of Health Impacts: The Case of Dioxins and Furans in Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:5314-:d:1099599
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/5314/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/5314/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yi Li & Yiman Cheng & Luyao Zhou & Yongliang Yang, 2021. "Advances, Norms, and Perspectives in Product Chemical Footprint Research," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-17, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:5314-:d:1099599. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.