IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i6p5172-d1097381.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Models of Teaching Science Communication

Author

Listed:
  • Carolina Llorente

    (Studies Center on Science, Communication and Society, Department of Medicine and Life Sciences, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, 08002 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Gema Revuelta

    (Studies Center on Science, Communication and Society, Department of Medicine and Life Sciences, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, 08002 Barcelona, Spain)

Abstract

Changes in the communication ecosystem have generated profound transformations in current science communication. In the same way, the coexistence of diverse actors with different objectives and professional standards also raises new ethical dilemmas. The main objective of this research was to identify existing models of teaching science communication to scientists and professional communicators worldwide. To this end, we conducted 26 semi-structured interviews with science communication teachers from 15 different countries. From these interviews, we identified three models of teaching science communication to scientists: (A) the practical model, where skills such as writing, public speaking, etc., are taught; (B) the reflective model that teaches theory and the history of science communication to enable researchers to understand the relationship between science and society; and (C) the disruptive model, where traditional roles of scientific knowledge production as well as relationships and power roles in science are challenged. On the other hand, we have identified two models for professional science communicators: (A) the professional model, which is subdivided into two different approaches—theoretical (historical review, understanding of the science–society relationships, etc.) and skill-based (writing, audiovisual, etc.) that coexist in teaching programs—and (B) the research model, where tools, concepts, and methodologies for science communication research are taught.

Suggested Citation

  • Carolina Llorente & Gema Revuelta, 2023. "Models of Teaching Science Communication," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-22, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:5172-:d:1097381
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/5172/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/5172/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sven Helmer & David B. Blumenthal & Kathrin Paschen, 2020. "What is meaningful research and how should we measure it?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(1), pages 153-169, October.
    2. Boyce Rensberger, 2009. "Science journalism: Too close for comfort," Nature, Nature, vol. 459(7250), pages 1055-1056, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Edré Moreira & Wagner Meira & Marcos André Gonçalves & Alberto H. F. Laender, 2023. "The rise of hyperprolific authors in computer science: characterization and implications," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(5), pages 2945-2974, May.
    2. Antonio Fernandez-Cano, 2021. "Letter to the Editor: publish, publish … cursed!," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(4), pages 3673-3682, April.
    3. Holger Wormer, 2020. "German Media and Coronavirus: Exceptional Communication—Or Just a Catalyst for Existing Tendencies?," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 467-470.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:5172-:d:1097381. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.