IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i6p4789-d1091063.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reasons for Ineffectiveness in Improving Dewaterability of Anaerobically Digested Sludge by Bioleaching

Author

Listed:
  • Haochi Zhang

    (Department of Environmental Engineering, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Dejin Zhang

    (Department of Environmental Engineering, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Yujun Zhou

    (Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Chemical Pollution Control and Resources Reuse, School of Environmental and Biological Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, China)

  • Di Fang

    (Department of Environmental Engineering, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China)

  • Chunhong Cui

    (Department of Environmental Engineering, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China)

  • Jianru Liang

    (Department of Environmental Engineering, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China)

  • Bo Zhou

    (Department of Environmental Engineering, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China)

  • Mingjiang Zhang

    (Department of Environmental Engineering, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China)

  • Jiansheng Li

    (Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Chemical Pollution Control and Resources Reuse, School of Environmental and Biological Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, China)

  • Lixiang Zhou

    (Department of Environmental Engineering, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
    Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Solid Organic Waste Resource Utilization, Nanjing 210095, China)

Abstract

The use of bioleaching for anaerobically digested sludge (ADS) was found to be ineffective compared to using it for undigested sludge (UDS) for reasons elucidated in this study. Results showed that specific resistance to filtration of ADS increased during bioleaching. The pH value of ADS increased to 7.97 and remained unchanged during bioleaching, while it decreased to 2.98 for UDS. Added Fe 2+ was not detected as the energy source for ADS. Higher alkalinity and unavailable Fe 2+ in ADS prevented the growth of the Acidithiobacillus species. It was found that sludge pH increased to 8.40 and then stayed within an alkaline range, whereas slime EPS content rapidly increased to 8.13 mg DOC/g VSS. These results indicated that aeration seriously deteriorated the dewaterability of ADS through bioleaching due to the unexpected drastic increase of sludge pH and slime EPS content.

Suggested Citation

  • Haochi Zhang & Dejin Zhang & Yujun Zhou & Di Fang & Chunhong Cui & Jianru Liang & Bo Zhou & Mingjiang Zhang & Jiansheng Li & Lixiang Zhou, 2023. "Reasons for Ineffectiveness in Improving Dewaterability of Anaerobically Digested Sludge by Bioleaching," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-11, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:4789-:d:1091063
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/4789/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/4789/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:4789-:d:1091063. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.