IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i5p4635-d1088430.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Wind Effects on Dome Structures and Evaluation of CFD Simulations through Wind Tunnel Testing

Author

Listed:
  • Tiantian Li

    (Shanghai Typhoon Institute of China Meteorological Administration, Shanghai 200030, China)

  • Hongya Qu

    (Department of Bridge Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Yi Zhao

    (Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO 65409, USA)

  • Ryan Honerkamp

    (Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO 65409, USA)

  • Guirong Yan

    (Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO 65409, USA)

  • Arindam Chowdhury

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33174, USA)

  • Ioannis Zisis

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33174, USA)

Abstract

In the study, a series of wind tunnel tests were conducted to investigate wind effects acting on dome structures (1/60 scale) induced by straight-line winds at a Reynolds number in the order of 10 6 . Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations were performed as well, including a Large Eddy Simulation (LES) and Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) simulation, and their performances were validated by a comparison with the wind tunnel testing data. It is concluded that wind loads generally increase with upstream wind velocities, and they are reduced over suburban terrain due to ground friction. The maximum positive pressure normally occurs near the base of the dome on the windward side caused by the stagnation area and divergence of streamlines. The minimum suction pressure occurs at the apex of the dome because of the blockage of the dome and convergence of streamlines. Suction force is the most significant among all wind loads, and special attention should be paid to the roof design for proper wind resistance. Numerical simulations also indicate that LES results match better with the wind tunnel testing in terms of the distribution pattern of the mean pressure coefficient on the dome surface and total suction force. The mean and root-mean-square errors of the meridian pressure coefficient associated with the LES are about 60% less than those associated with RANS results, and the error of suction force is about 40–70% less. Moreover, the LES is more accurate in predicting the location of boundary layer separation and reproducing the complex flow field behind the dome, and is superior in simulating vortex structures around the dome to further understand the unsteadiness and dynamics in the flow field.

Suggested Citation

  • Tiantian Li & Hongya Qu & Yi Zhao & Ryan Honerkamp & Guirong Yan & Arindam Chowdhury & Ioannis Zisis, 2023. "Wind Effects on Dome Structures and Evaluation of CFD Simulations through Wind Tunnel Testing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-22, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:5:p:4635-:d:1088430
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/4635/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/4635/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:5:p:4635-:d:1088430. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.