IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i5p4382-d1084513.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Knowledge and Attitude toward End-of-Life Care of Nursing Students after Completing the Multi-Methods Teaching and Learning Palliative Care Nursing Course

Author

Listed:
  • Hartiah Haroen

    (Department of Community Health Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung 45363, Indonesia)

  • Ristina Mirwanti

    (Department of Critical Care and Emergency Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung 45363, Indonesia)

  • Citra Windani Mambang Sari

    (Department of Community Health Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung 45363, Indonesia)

Abstract

Introduction: This study aims to assess the palliative care nursing (PCN) knowledge and attitude of nursing students toward end-of-life care (EoLC) after completing the multi-methods PCN courses. Methods: A quasi-experimental study with a pre-and post-palliative survey was conducted. One hundred and sixty five nursing students from a faculty of nursing in Indonesia were enrolled, and knowledge and attitude were assessed using the palliative care quiz for nurses (PCQN) and the Frommelt Attitude Toward Care of the Dying and Death (FATCOD). Paired t -test and ANOVA were applied in this study. Results: After being involved in the PCN course, the mean score of PCN knowledge of the students increased significantly ( p < 0.001). According to sub-domain analysis, the knowledge increased significantly in pain and symptom management ( p < 0.001) and not significantly in the domains of theory and principle of the palliative, psychosocial, and spiritual care ( p = 0.053; p = 0.080). Moreover, students’ attitude toward EoLC also increased significantly ( p < 0.001), and positive attitudes increased from 75.6% to 91.5%. According to the ANOVA test, knowledge in two different groups (witnessed dying people and GPA) is not statistically meaningful (FWDP (1158) = 0.817, p = 0.367; FGPA (2.158) = 1.143, p = 0.322). Similarly, attitudes toward EoLC in two different groups are not statistically meaningful (FWD (1158) = 0.971. p = 0.326, FGPA (1157) = 1.278, p = 0.281). Conclusion: PCN courses with multi-method learning and teaching are effective to increase PCN knowledge, particularly in pain and symptom management knowledge, and also effective in increasing the positive attitudes toward EoLC.

Suggested Citation

  • Hartiah Haroen & Ristina Mirwanti & Citra Windani Mambang Sari, 2023. "Knowledge and Attitude toward End-of-Life Care of Nursing Students after Completing the Multi-Methods Teaching and Learning Palliative Care Nursing Course," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-10, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:5:p:4382-:d:1084513
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/4382/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/4382/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abdallah Ahmad Alwawi & Hammoda Abu-Odah & Jonathan Bayuo, 2022. "Palliative Care Knowledge and Attitudes towards End-of-Life Care among Undergraduate Nursing Students at Al-Quds University: Implications for Palestinian Education," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-11, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:5:p:4382-:d:1084513. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.