IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i4p3291-d1065028.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of Eight Faba Bean ( Vicia faba L.) Cultivars for Drought Stress Tolerance through Molecular, Morphological, and Physiochemical Parameters

Author

Listed:
  • Shaimaa M. Essa

    (Genetics Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44511, Egypt)

  • Hany A. Wafa

    (Genetics Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44511, Egypt)

  • EL-Sayed I. Mahgoub

    (Genetics Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44511, Egypt)

  • Abdallah A. Hassanin

    (Genetics Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44511, Egypt)

  • Jameel M. Al-Khayri

    (Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, College of Agriculture and Food Sciences, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia)

  • Areej S. Jalal

    (Department of Biology, College of Science, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia)

  • Diaa Abd El-Moneim

    (Department of Plant Production, (Genetic Branch), Faculty of Environmental and Agricultural Sciences, Arish University, El-Arish 45511, Egypt)

  • Salha M. ALshamrani

    (Department of Biology, College of Science, University of Jeddah, Jeddah 21959, Saudi Arabia)

  • Fatmah A. Safhi

    (Department of Biology, College of Science, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia)

  • Ahmed S. Eldomiaty

    (Genetics Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44511, Egypt)

Abstract

Determining and improving drought-tolerant cultivars is a major goal of plant breeding to face climate change. The productivity of faba bean in Egypt is affected by abiotic stresses, especially drought stress. This study evaluated eight Egyptian faba bean cultivars for drought tolerance under three soil water regimes consisting of well-watered (100% field capacity), moderate drought stress (50% field capacity), and severe drought stress (25% field capacity) regimes in pots under greenhouse conditions using biochemical, physiochemical, and molecular parameters. The cultivars Nubariya 1, Nubariya 3, and Giza 716 showed the highest proline content values under 50% field capacity conditions, with 4.94, 4.39, and 4.26 mmol/g fresh weights, respectively. On the other hand, the cultivars Sakha 1, Sakha 4, Nubariya 1, and Nubariya 3 exhibited the highest proline contents (7.8, 7.53, 6.17, and 6.25, respectively) under 25% field capacity treatment. The molecular profiling was conducted using SCoT and SRAP approaches. Fresh leaves were utilized to extract the DNA, and ten primers for SRAP and six for SCoT were used in the PCR procedures. SCoT and SRAP-PCR generated 72 loci, of which, 55 were polymorphic, and 17 were monomorphic. SCoT and SRAP each had 48 and 24 total loci, respectively. The average polymorphism (%) values achieved via SCoT and SRAP were 70.93% and 80%, respectively. Based on the molecular profiles, the cluster analysis identified three clusters. The first cluster comprised Giza 716 cultivars; the second cluster included Sakha 1, Sakha 3, Sakha 4, and Akba 3300 cultivars; the third cluster comprised two cultivars Nubariya 1 and Nubariya3. According to the study’s findings, Sakha 1, Sakha 4, Nubariya 1, and Nubariya 3 are remarkable parents for developing drought-tolerant faba bean genotypes. Additionally, this study concluded that SRAP and SCoT markers recreated trustworthy banding profiles to evaluate the genetic polymorphism among faba bean cultivars, which are regarded as the cornerstone for genetic improvements in crops.

Suggested Citation

  • Shaimaa M. Essa & Hany A. Wafa & EL-Sayed I. Mahgoub & Abdallah A. Hassanin & Jameel M. Al-Khayri & Areej S. Jalal & Diaa Abd El-Moneim & Salha M. ALshamrani & Fatmah A. Safhi & Ahmed S. Eldomiaty, 2023. "Assessment of Eight Faba Bean ( Vicia faba L.) Cultivars for Drought Stress Tolerance through Molecular, Morphological, and Physiochemical Parameters," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-14, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3291-:d:1065028
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3291/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3291/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3291-:d:1065028. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.