IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i4p3250-d1064335.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Direct and Indirect Infection Effects of Four Potent Fungal Isolates on the Survival and Performance of Fall Armyworm Larval Parasitoid Cotesia icipe

Author

Listed:
  • Junitor Chepkemoi

    (International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology ( icipe ), Nairobi P.O. Box 30772-00100, Kenya
    African Regional Postgraduate Programme in Insect Science (ARPPIS), University of Ghana, Legon, Accra P.O. Box LG 68, Ghana)

  • Ken Okwae Fening

    (African Regional Postgraduate Programme in Insect Science (ARPPIS), University of Ghana, Legon, Accra P.O. Box LG 68, Ghana)

  • Felicitas Chaba Ambele

    (Department of Zoology, University of Bamenda, Bambili P.O. Box 39, Cameroon)

  • Joseph Munywoki

    (International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology ( icipe ), Nairobi P.O. Box 30772-00100, Kenya)

  • Komivi Senyo Akutse

    (International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology ( icipe ), Nairobi P.O. Box 30772-00100, Kenya)

Abstract

Fall armyworm (FAW), Spodoptera frugiperda , has recently invaded Africa where it is seriously threatening food security. Current management methods rely heavily on synthetic insecticides which are harmful to humans, the environment, and non-target beneficial insects. Cotesia icipe was recently identified as a major FAW-associated indigenous parasitoid causing a high parasitism rate on the pest in Kenya. Previous studies have demonstrated the efficacy of Metarhizium anisopliae ICIPE 7, ICIPE 41, ICIPE 78, and Beauveria bassiana ICIPE 621 against FAW. However, limited information is available on the interactions between these potent isolates and C. icipe . This study therefore assessed direct and indirect infection effects of these fungal isolates on C. icipe , induced 2nd instar FAW mortality, and parasitism rates of the infected C. icipe . Results showed that when C. icipe were directly exposed to dry conidia of the fungal isolates, ICIPE 7 and ICIPE 41 caused the highest (100%) C. icipe adult mortality seven days post-exposure. Both isolates also induced the highest FAW larval mortality of 55% and 53%, respectively. ICIPE 78 recorded the highest parasitism rates after direct infection. In the indirect exposure (fungal-infected FAW larvae exposed to the parasitoid), 1 × 10 9 conidia mL −1 recorded high C. icipe adult and FAW 2nd instar mortalities for all fungal isolates. This study provides an important baseline for effective fungal-based biopesticides development that could also be used in augmentative biological control. However, further studies are warranted to assess the performance of C. icipe in combination with these potent biopesticides in the field.

Suggested Citation

  • Junitor Chepkemoi & Ken Okwae Fening & Felicitas Chaba Ambele & Joseph Munywoki & Komivi Senyo Akutse, 2023. "Direct and Indirect Infection Effects of Four Potent Fungal Isolates on the Survival and Performance of Fall Armyworm Larval Parasitoid Cotesia icipe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-12, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3250-:d:1064335
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3250/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3250/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michael Hilary Otim & Angella Lowra Ajam & Geofrey Ogwal & Stella Aropet Adumo & Dalton Kanyesigye & Saliou Niassy & Girma Hailu & Komivi Senyo Akutse & Sevgan Subramanian, 2024. "Biorationals and Synthetic Insecticides for Controlling Fall Armyworm and Their Influence on the Abundance and Diversity of Parasitoids," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-19, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3250-:d:1064335. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.