IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i3p2004-d1042554.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Uncertainty Quantification of the CO 2 Storage Process in the Bunter Closure 36 Model

Author

Listed:
  • Masoud Ahmadinia

    (School of Engineering, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3AT, UK)

  • Mahdi Sadri

    (TÜV SÜD National Engineering Laboratory, Glasgow G75 0QF, UK)

  • Behzad Nobakht

    (TÜV SÜD National Engineering Laboratory, Glasgow G75 0QF, UK)

  • Seyed M. Shariatipour

    (Centre for Fluid and Complex Systems, Coventry University, Coventry CV1 5FB, UK)

Abstract

The UK plans to bring all greenhouse gas emissions to net-zero by 2050. Carbon capture and storage (CCS), an important strategy to reduce global CO 2 emissions, is one of the critical objectives of this UK net-zero plan. Among the possible storage site options, saline aquifers are one of the most promising candidates for long-term CO 2 sequestrations. Despite its promising potential, few studies have been conducted on the CO 2 storage process in the Bunter Closure 36 model located off the eastern shore of the UK. Located amid a number of oil fields, Bunter is one of the primary candidates for CO 2 storage in the UK, with plans to store more than 280 Mt of CO 2 from injections starting in 2027. As saline aquifers are usually sparsely drilled with minimal dynamic data, any model is subject to a level of uncertainty. This is the first study on the impact of the model and fluid uncertainties on the CO 2 storage process in Bunter. This study attempted to fully accommodate the uncertainty space on Bunter by performing twenty thousand forward simulations using a vertical equilibrium-based simulator. The joint impact of five uncertain parameters using data-driven models was analysed. The results of this work will improve our understanding of the carbon storage process in the Bunter model before the injection phase is initiated. Due to the complexity of the model, it is not recommended to make a general statement about the influence of a single variable on CO 2 plume migration in the Bunter model. The reservoir temperature was shown to have the most impact on the plume dynamics (overall importance of 41%), followed by pressure (21%), permeability (17%), elevation (13%), and porosity (8%), respectively. The results also showed that a lower temperature and higher pressure in the Bunter reservoir condition would result in a higher density and, consequently, a higher structural capacity.

Suggested Citation

  • Masoud Ahmadinia & Mahdi Sadri & Behzad Nobakht & Seyed M. Shariatipour, 2023. "Uncertainty Quantification of the CO 2 Storage Process in the Bunter Closure 36 Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-11, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2004-:d:1042554
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2004/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2004/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2004-:d:1042554. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.