IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i3p1908-d1040977.html

A Hybrid Variable Weight Theory Approach of Hierarchical Analysis and Multi-Layer Perceptron for Landslide Susceptibility Evaluation: A Case Study in Luanchuan County, China

Author

Listed:
  • Minghong Li

    (School of Environmental Studies, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Yuanxiang Guo

    (School of Environmental Studies, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Danyuan Luo

    (School of Environmental Studies, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Chuanming Ma

    (School of Environmental Studies, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China)

Abstract

Landslides, which can cause significant losses of lives or property damages, result from several different environmental factors whose influences are very complex. Thus, the statistical multi-layer perceptron (MLP) and heuristic analytical hierarchy process (AHP) are employed in the evaluation of landslide susceptibility. However, the landslide susceptibility maps drawn by these two methods are always affected by subjectivity and randomness. In the present study, we introduce variable weight theory (VW) to improve the MLP and AHP methods, and two novel hybrid models, AHP-VW and MLP-VW, are respectively proposed. VW theory is used to redistribute the weights of the factors in the two constant weight evaluations. This is so that the weights of the factors change with different evaluation units, thereby eliminating the subjectivity and randomness problems. The landslide susceptibility maps of the study area were categorized into very low, low, moderate, high, and very high susceptibility grades. The landslide susceptibility maps of the four models are validated by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The area under the curve (AUC) is 0.825 for the AHP model, 0.879 for the MLP model, 0.873 for the AHP-VW model, and 0.915 for the MLP-VW model. The results show that the landslide susceptibility map drawn by statistical MLP is better than that drawn by heuristic AHP, which is consistent with many other current research results. Furthermore, VW can significantly improve the performance of constant-weight single models. Landslide susceptibility maps drawn by the statistical MLP model hybrid VW can be used for regional land use planning and landslide hazard mitigation purposes.

Suggested Citation

  • Minghong Li & Yuanxiang Guo & Danyuan Luo & Chuanming Ma, 2023. "A Hybrid Variable Weight Theory Approach of Hierarchical Analysis and Multi-Layer Perceptron for Landslide Susceptibility Evaluation: A Case Study in Luanchuan County, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:1908-:d:1040977
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/1908/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/1908/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Di Wang & Mengmeng Hao & Shuai Chen & Ze Meng & Dong Jiang & Fangyu Ding, 2021. "Assessment of landslide susceptibility and risk factors in China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 108(3), pages 3045-3059, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Junnan Wu & Xin Liu & Dianqi Pan & Yichen Zhang & Jiquan Zhang & Kai Ke, 2023. "Research on Safety Evaluation of Municipal Sewage Treatment Plant Based on Improved Best-Worst Method and Fuzzy Comprehensive Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-15, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xianyu Yu & Tingting Xiong & Weiwei Jiang & Jianguo Zhou, 2023. "Comparative Assessment of the Efficacy of the Five Kinds of Models in Landslide Susceptibility Map for Factor Screening: A Case Study at Zigui-Badong in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-26, January.
    2. Yadviga Tynchenko & Vladislav Kukartsev & Vadim Tynchenko & Oksana Kukartseva & Tatyana Panfilova & Alexey Gladkov & Van Nguyen & Ivan Malashin, 2024. "Landslide Assessment Classification Using Deep Neural Networks Based on Climate and Geospatial Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-26, August.
    3. Mengyao Wang & Wenkun Wang & Caiyan Dai & Chenglong Ma & Yun Luo & Ming Xu, 2024. "Risk analysis and evaluation of emergency rescue in landslide disaster," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 120(15), pages 14809-14835, December.
    4. Zhijie Ning & Yongbo Tie & Cai Sun & Wei Xu, 2025. "Geohazard susceptibility mapping considering spatial heterogeneity: a case study of Xide County in Sichuan Province," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 121(20), pages 23581-23602, December.
    5. Li Zhuo & Yupu Huang & Jing Zheng & Jingjing Cao & Donghu Guo, 2023. "Landslide Susceptibility Mapping in Guangdong Province, China, Using Random Forest Model and Considering Sample Type and Balance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-23, June.
    6. Li Li & Rundong Feng & Jianchao Xi, 2021. "Ecological Risk Assessment and Protection Zone Identification for Linear Cultural Heritage: A Case Study of the Ming Great Wall," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-18, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:1908-:d:1040977. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.