Author
Listed:
- Liang-Tong Zhan
(MOE Key Laboratory of Soft Soils and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)
- Lin-Feng Cao
(MOE Key Laboratory of Soft Soils and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)
- Rui Zhao
(Key Laboratory of Safe Construction and Intelligent Maintenance of Urban Shield Tunnels of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou City University, Hangzhou 310058, China)
- Zhao-Hua Ding
(MOE Key Laboratory of Soft Soils and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)
- Shi-Ping Xie
(Tianjin Zhonglian Gelin Science and Technology Development Co., Ltd., Tianjin 300387, China)
- Yun-Min Chen
(MOE Key Laboratory of Soft Soils and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)
Abstract
The geosynthetic clay liner (GCL) overlap plays a key role in maintaining hydraulic performance of the barrier systems, e.g., the bottom liner and cover systems. However, its influences on the behavior of the vertical barrier have been rarely investigated. This paper aims to address this issue using the large-scale model test and 3-dimensional finite element (FE) modeling. In the model test, the GCL overlap at the width of 500 mm was tested under a constant hydraulic head of 1 m and confining stress ranging from 10 to 150 kPa using a newly developed large-scale apparatus. Compared with the flexible wall permeameter, this apparatus could guarantee full field-scale GCL overlap to be tested. Results showed that the effective hydraulic conductivity of the GCL overlap decreased from 10 −8 to 10 −9 cm/s as the confining stress increased from 10 to 150 kPa. The addition of supplemental bentonite paste in between the overlap with a water-to-bentonite ratio of 19:1 contributed to reducing the effective hydraulic conductivity by 60% compared with that for a GCL overlap without bentonite paste. The breakthrough time for the soil-bentonite (SB) cutoff wall composited with GCLs was 64% longer in comparison with that for the single SB wall. Additionally, the breakthrough after 50 years is made for the entire depth of the single SB wall while at the depth no more than 0.9 m for the composite wall with bentonite paste at the GCL overlap. With consideration that the depth of the groundwater table is generally greater than 1 m, the GCL–SB composite cutoff wall will exhibit a good performance in containing groundwater contaminants in the field, especially when applying bentonite paste at the GCL overlap.
Suggested Citation
Liang-Tong Zhan & Lin-Feng Cao & Rui Zhao & Zhao-Hua Ding & Shi-Ping Xie & Yun-Min Chen, 2023.
"Performances of the Soil–Bentonite Cutoff Wall Composited with Geosynthetic Clay Liners: Large-Scale Model Tests and Numerical Simulations,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-16, January.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:1886-:d:1040454
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:1886-:d:1040454. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.