IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i2p1102-d1027800.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental Impact Comparison Analysis between a Traditional Hot Mixed Asphalt (HMA) and with the Addition of Recycled Post-Consumer Polyethylene Terephthalate (RPET) through the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Methodology

Author

Listed:
  • Mario Rene Rivera Osorto

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Brasilia, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil)

  • Michéle Dal Toé Casagrande

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Brasilia, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil)

Abstract

The present study presents a cradle-to-built life cycle assessment (LCA) for a road pavements structure of hot mixed asphalt (HMA) with recycled post-consumer polyethylene terephthalate (RPET) addition through the “dry” process using a comparison analysis between declared units equivalent of 1 ton of produced mix and functional units equivalent of 1 m 2 pavement variants under the Brazilian “National Design Methodology” (MeDiNa), in contrast with a conventional mix variant. The Tool TRACI 2.0 for reducing and assessing chemical and other environmental impacts was applied for each alternative, assessing the impacts into categories such as acidification, eutrophication, freshwater ecotoxicity, global warming potential, human health, ozone depletion, and smog formation. The life-cycle impact assessment results were interpreted through an internal normalization criteria and weighting rule, obtaining an environmental score for each alternative and allowing an easy stakeholder interpretation. Considering the better mechanical properties and overall functional performance of the HMA + RPET mixes, the functional unit comparison on LCA methodology results in savings in all environmental impact categories for each square meter of pavement constructed and ready to use. For the functional units, the HMA + RPET pavement structures (FU 2 and FU 3) resulted in lower environmental scores (ES) with 49.2 and 47.1, respectively, representing a difference of 26.9 and 29 score points in comparison to the conventional pavement structure (FU 1 − C), with an ES of 76.1. It represents 38% of environmental savings in terms of the environmental score in favor of sustainable pavement alternatives. Focusing on the impact in global warming potential, the use of RPET in the HMA mixes for pavement design can result in savings up to 47.44% of impact decrease (20.4 ES) in comparison with the conventional-mix pavement structure proposal. This result supports the environmental sustainability of the HMA + RPET mixes and is a precedent for future research on new geotechnical and pavement alternative materials.

Suggested Citation

  • Mario Rene Rivera Osorto & Michéle Dal Toé Casagrande, 2023. "Environmental Impact Comparison Analysis between a Traditional Hot Mixed Asphalt (HMA) and with the Addition of Recycled Post-Consumer Polyethylene Terephthalate (RPET) through the Life Cycle Assessme," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-21, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:2:p:1102-:d:1027800
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/2/1102/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/2/1102/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mohamed Meftah Ben Zair & Fauzan Mohd Jakarni & Ratnasamy Muniandy & Salihudin Hassim, 2021. "A Brief Review: Application of Recycled Polyethylene Terephthalate in Asphalt Pavement Reinforcement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-17, January.
    2. Diana Movilla-Quesada & Manuel Lagos-Varas & Aitor C. Raposeiras & Osvaldo Muñoz-Cáceres & Valerio C. Andrés-Valeri & Carla Aguilar-Vidal, 2021. "Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and the Environmental Impact of the Production of Asphalt Mixes Modified with Recycled Materials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-15, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abdul Muqeet Shah & Rida Hameed Lodhi & Muhammad Faisal Javed & Michał Jasiński & Elżbieta Jasińska & Miroslava Gono, 2023. "Structural Performance of Waste Plastic Bottles Modified Asphalt: A Review," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-29, January.
    2. Diana Movilla-Quesada & Aitor C. Raposeiras & Edgardo Guíñez & Almudena Frechilla-Alonso, 2023. "A Comparative Study of the Effect of Moisture Susceptibility on Polyethylene Terephthalate–Modified Asphalt Mixes under Different Regulatory Procedures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-17, October.
    3. Mohammed Salah Nasr & Awham Jumah Salman & Rusul Jaber Ghayyib & Ali Shubbar & Shahad Al-Mamoori & Zainab Al-khafaji & Tameem Mohammed Hashim & Zaid Ali Hasan & Monower Sadique, 2023. "Effect of Clay Brick Waste Powder on the Fresh and Hardened Properties of Self-Compacting Concrete: State-of-the-Art and Life Cycle Assessment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-23, June.
    4. Zafreen Elahi & Fauzan Mohd Jakarni & Ratnasamy Muniandy & Salihudin Hassim & Mohd Shahrizal Ab Razak & Anwaar Hazoor Ansari & Mohamed Meftah Ben Zair, 2021. "Waste Cooking Oil as a Sustainable Bio Modifier for Asphalt Modification: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-27, October.
    5. Taísa Medina & João Luiz Calmon & Darli Vieira & Alencar Bravo & Thalya Vieira, 2023. "Life Cycle Assessment of Road Pavements That Incorporate Waste Reuse: A Systematic Review and Guidelines Proposal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-21, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:2:p:1102-:d:1027800. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.