IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i24p16749-d1298386.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimizing Forest Harvesting Efficiency: A Comparative Analysis of Small-Sized Logging Crews Using Cable-Grapple Skidders

Author

Listed:
  • Stanimir Stoilov

    (Department of Technologies and Mechanization of Forestry, Faculty of Forestry, University of Forestry, 10, Kliment Ohridski Blvd., 1797 Sofia, Bulgaria)

  • Pavel Nichev

    (Department of Technologies and Mechanization of Forestry, Faculty of Forestry, University of Forestry, 10, Kliment Ohridski Blvd., 1797 Sofia, Bulgaria)

  • Georgi Angelov

    (Department of Technologies and Mechanization of Forestry, Faculty of Forestry, University of Forestry, 10, Kliment Ohridski Blvd., 1797 Sofia, Bulgaria)

  • Marina Chavenetidou

    (Laboratory of Forest Utilization, School of Forestry and Natural Environment, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, P.O. Box 227, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Petros A. Tsioras

    (Laboratory of Forest Utilization, School of Forestry and Natural Environment, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, P.O. Box 227, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece)

Abstract

Examination of the technical and economic dimensions of skidding operations is imperative for sustainable forest management, offering invaluable insights crucial for the formulation of sustainable forestry strategies. In many countries, the shift from modified agricultural machinery to purpose-built forest machinery has become apparent in forest operations. However, this transition often accompanies a reduction in logging crew size, raising new questions about productivity, costs, and ergonomics of the introduced harvesting systems. This study investigates two skidding systems utilizing the cable-grapple skidder Welte 115/5L, differing in work team size: one with one skidder operator and two chainsaw operators (WT3) and the other with one skidder operator and one chainsaw operator (WT2). Conducted in natural European beech forests in southern Bulgaria, the research focused on the group shelterwood system within the Natura 2000 network. Both WT3 and WT2 exhibited net skidding productivity of 9.96 m 3 PMH −1 over a mean skidding distance of 300 m and a mean winching distance of 20 m, outperforming conventional systems in the area. Despite this, there were notable differences in gross skidding productivity (8.64 m 3 SMH −1 for WT3 vs. 7.30 m 3 SMH −1 for WT2), affecting skidding cost (EUR 5.41 m −3 for WT3 vs. EUR 6.62 m −3 for WT2) and unit production cost (EUR 9.33 m −3 vs. EUR 11.53 m −3 ). This study highlights that the cable-grapple skidder can be effectively employed by smaller teams, providing higher productivity, lower unit cost, and increased flexibility during piling, primarily due to the presence of the knuckle-boom loader. While WT2 experienced more delays and production pressure, the findings suggest that WT3 represents a balanced option for small logging crews, ensuring sustainable forest operations in the face of workforce challenges.

Suggested Citation

  • Stanimir Stoilov & Pavel Nichev & Georgi Angelov & Marina Chavenetidou & Petros A. Tsioras, 2023. "Optimizing Forest Harvesting Efficiency: A Comparative Analysis of Small-Sized Logging Crews Using Cable-Grapple Skidders," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-16, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:24:p:16749-:d:1298386
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/24/16749/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/24/16749/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. F. K. Behjou & B. Majnounian & M. Namiranian & J. Dvořák, 2008. "Time study and skidding capacity of the wheeled skidder Timberjack 450C in Caspian forests," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 54(4), pages 183-188.
    2. F. K. Behjou & B. Majnounian & J. Dvořák & M. Namiranian & A. Saeed & J. Feghhi, 2009. "Productivity and cost of manual felling with a chainsaw in Caspian forests," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 55(2), pages 96-100.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. F. K. Behjou & B. Majnounian & J. Dvořák & M. Namiranian & A. Saeed & J. Feghhi, 2009. "Productivity and cost of manual felling with a chainsaw in Caspian forests," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 55(2), pages 96-100.
    2. M. Lotfalian & S. Khosrozadeh & S.A. Hosseini & M. Kazemi & N. Zare, 2016. "Determination of forest skid trail density in Caspian forests, Iran," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 62(2), pages 80-87.
    3. N. Gilanipoor & A. Najafi & S.M. Heshmat Alvaezin, 2012. "Productivity and cost of farm tractor skidding," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 58(1), pages 21-26.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:24:p:16749-:d:1298386. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.