IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i23p16517-d1293179.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating Construction Projects’ Alternatives Using Lean Construction and Sustainability Principles in an Information Model Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Pedro Saieg Faria

    (TecGraf, Institute of Technical-Scientific Software Development, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio), Rio de Janeiro 22451-900, Brazil)

  • Elisa Dominguez Sotelino

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio), Rio de Janeiro 22451-900, Brazil)

  • Cristiano Saad Travassos do Carmo

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio), Rio de Janeiro 22451-900, Brazil)

  • Daniel Luiz Mattos Nascimento

    (Business School, University of Barcelona, 08034 Barcelona, Spain)

Abstract

This study evaluates and validates how BIM functionalities can foster the consideration of lean construction and sustainability principles in building design. To this end, a plugin was developed and implemented in a BIM-enabled visualization environment. This system aims to help a user decide the best design between alternatives, while considering the user’s perspective on what generates value in the project. To illustrate and validate the usability and importance of the system, the design of a warehouse with specific requirements was considered. Four design alternatives were modeled considering different types of superstructures, building envelopes, and materials. The system imported an external database and calculated the general costs, CO 2 emissions, and thermal comfort indicators for each model. It also incorporated user-defined weights for each indicator and graphically displayed the results indicating the best options through a multiple attribute decision method. From the obtained results, it was concluded that it is possible to integrate BIM and lean principles to support sustainable development in the construction industry. Through an experiment with warehouse alternatives, the proposed approach revealed that the best project could save nearly 50% of CO 2 emissions when compared to the worst project and that the second-best project had the best performance in terms of thermal heat flow (1.80 Megawatts). The results also indicate that the system can be a great asset in supporting the decision-making process of selecting the best design alternative and understanding the impact of design changes on cost and on the environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Pedro Saieg Faria & Elisa Dominguez Sotelino & Cristiano Saad Travassos do Carmo & Daniel Luiz Mattos Nascimento, 2023. "Evaluating Construction Projects’ Alternatives Using Lean Construction and Sustainability Principles in an Information Model Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-19, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:23:p:16517-:d:1293179
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/23/16517/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/23/16517/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:23:p:16517-:d:1293179. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.