IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i20p15135-d1264896.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Protecting Cape Town’s Groundwater from Fuel Stations: An In-Depth Analysis of Regulatory Requirements

Author

Listed:
  • Eden Alexandre Nsimba

    (Department of Environmental and Occupational Studies, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Corner of Hanover and Tennant Street, Cape Town 8000, South Africa)

  • Ntokozo Malaza

    (Department of Environmental and Occupational Studies, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Corner of Hanover and Tennant Street, Cape Town 8000, South Africa)

  • Thandazile Marazula

    (Department of Environmental and Occupational Studies, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Corner of Hanover and Tennant Street, Cape Town 8000, South Africa)

Abstract

In the face of mounting water supply challenges, Cape Town has increasingly turned to alternative sources, like groundwater. However, the utilisation of groundwater carries inherent risks, particularly the contamination stemming from land-based activities, such as fuel stations. Leaks from underground tanks at these stations represent a major global cause of groundwater pollution, and Cape Town is no exception. To safeguard public health and mitigate potential harm, it is imperative to examine the legal regulations governing fuel station development, assess measures for controlling their environmental impacts and evaluate strategies for managing the associated risks. This study aims to provide an exhaustive review of the regulatory framework concerning the environmental impacts of fuel stations, focusing on groundwater protection in Cape Town. A combination of desk research and interviews was employed to gather and analyse data. The findings show a deficiency in precautionary measures for safeguarding groundwater near fuel stations. Consequently, through this study, the existing legal framework’s effectiveness is called into question, with this study suggesting actions to address these identified shortcomings.

Suggested Citation

  • Eden Alexandre Nsimba & Ntokozo Malaza & Thandazile Marazula, 2023. "Protecting Cape Town’s Groundwater from Fuel Stations: An In-Depth Analysis of Regulatory Requirements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-13, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:20:p:15135-:d:1264896
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/20/15135/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/20/15135/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xue Bai & Kai Song & Jian Liu & Adam Khalifa Mohamed & Chenya Mou & Dan Liu, 2019. "Health Risk Assessment of Groundwater Contaminated by Oil Pollutants Based on Numerical Modeling," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-20, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guanru Zhang & Peng Lu & Yi Huang, 2023. "The Interference of Pre-Processing Software for the Numerical Simulation of Groundwater on the Cognition of Environmental Students: Model Mesh Construction as an Example," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-11, January.
    2. Liang Xiao & Yong Zhou & He Huang & Yu-Jie Liu & Ke Li & Meng-Yao Li & Yang Tian & Fei Wu, 2020. "Application of Geostatistical Analysis and Random Forest for Source Analysis and Human Health Risk Assessment of Potentially Toxic Elements (PTEs) in Arable Land Soil," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-19, December.
    3. Fei Wang & Kai Song & Xuelian He & Yue Peng & Dan Liu & Jian Liu, 2021. "Identification of Groundwater Pollution Characteristics and Health Risk Assessment of a Landfill in a Low Permeability Area," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-19, July.
    4. Rebekah G. K. Hinton & Christopher J. A. Macleod & Mads Troldborg & Modesta B. Kanjaye & Robert M. Kalin, 2023. "The Status of Sanitation in Malawi: Is SDG6.2 Achievable?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(15), pages 1-20, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:20:p:15135-:d:1264896. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.