Author
Listed:
- Xulei Chen
(Nanjing Institute of Agricultural Mechanization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Nanjing 210014, China)
- Fengwei Gu
(Nanjing Institute of Agricultural Mechanization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Nanjing 210014, China)
- Zhichao Hu
(Nanjing Institute of Agricultural Mechanization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Nanjing 210014, China)
- Feng Wu
(Nanjing Institute of Agricultural Mechanization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Nanjing 210014, China)
- Weiwen Luo
(Nanjing Institute of Agricultural Mechanization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Nanjing 210014, China)
- Kai Guo
(Nanjing Institute of Agricultural Mechanization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Nanjing 210014, China)
Abstract
In recent years, there have been many studies on the calibration of soil simulation parameters; however, there are few soil parameters for wheat grown after rice that have been calibrated in the lower reaches of the Yangtze River, and the data from such calibrations remain inaccurate. Therefore, using the soil of Jiangsu as our research object, a soil parameter calibration was carried out based on the EEPA (Edinburgh elastoplastic adhesion) model and using the discrete element software EDEM (2020, DEM-Solutions, Edinburgh, UK). The depression depth measured via a uniaxial compression test and the maximum crushing force measured via an unconfined compression test were taken as indexes. The Plackett–Burman test was used to screen seven influencing factors (recovery coefficient, static friction coefficient, rolling friction coefficient, surface energy, contact plastic deformation ratio, tensile exp, and tangential stiff multiplier). The recovery coefficient and static friction coefficient were analyzed using a central composite test with depression depth as an index. The surface energy, plastic deformation ratio, and tangential stiffness factor were analyzed via a Box–Behnken test, with the maximum crushing force as the index. Taking the measured depression depth of 3.36mm and the maximum destructive power of 210 N as the target, the following final data were obtained—recovery coefficient: 0.322, static friction coefficient: 0.676, rolling friction coefficient: 0.5, surface energy: 17.158, contact plastic deformation ratio: 0.358, tensile exp: 2, and tangential stiff multiplier: 0.8. Finally, the simulation value and the actual value of the parameter group were verified and compared. It was found that the mismatch coefficient R 2 of the actual value and the simulation value is 93.509%. The mismatch coefficient R 2 between the actual and simulated values of unconfined compressive test is 94.2%. This shows that the curves obtained from the real test and simulation test have a high similarity. This study can provide technical support for the simulation and optimization of growing wheat after rice seeding equipment in the lower reaches of Yangtze River in China.
Suggested Citation
Xulei Chen & Fengwei Gu & Zhichao Hu & Feng Wu & Weiwen Luo & Kai Guo, 2023.
"The Calibration of Soil Simulation Parameters for Wheat Grown after Rice in the Yangtze River Basin of China,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-16, October.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:20:p:15079-:d:1263512
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:20:p:15079-:d:1263512. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.