IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i20p14771-d1257876.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Practical Solutions for Addressing Challenges in National Reporting for the Enhanced Transparency Framework: Cases from Developing Countries in the Asia–Pacific Region

Author

Listed:
  • Temuulen Murun

    (Climate and Energy Area, Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES), Hayama 240-0115, Japan)

  • Chisa Umemiya

    (Climate and Energy Area, Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES), Hayama 240-0115, Japan
    Biodiversity and Forestry Area, Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES), Hayama 240-0115, Japan)

  • Takashi Morimoto

    (Mitsubishi UFJ Research and Consulting Co., Ltd., Tokyo 105-8501, Japan)

  • Tomohiko Hattori

    (Sasakawa Africa Association, Tokyo 105-0001, Japan)

Abstract

Transitioning to the Enhanced Transparency Framework (ETF) under the Paris Agreement (PA) from the current measurement, reporting and verification (MRV) arrangements under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) requires developing countries to enhance their national reporting systems in a sustainable way. There are various challenges that developing countries face in preparing national reporting under the existing MRV framework. The objective of this paper is to identify practical solutions as good practices in the short and long term to address the common challenges facing many developing countries as they prepare their national climate reporting. We collected information on practical solutions implemented by developing countries to overcome common challenges during preparation of their national reporting. There were some limitations regarding data collection using a country survey since we received responses from only six countries and two organizations, resulting in a small sample. Good practices for addressing common challenges include developing a national legal framework for transparency-related work, assigning a main coordinating institution, collaborating with domestic institutions for methodology development on emission reduction, and establishing university curricula on transparency. Replicating these solutions as good practices on how to deal with the challenges would be one way for developing countries to enhance their respective reporting systems in a sustainable manner. Furthermore, the paper highlights three underlying factors (efficiency, accountability, and sustainability) behind those practical solutions. These underlying factors should be considered important as guiding principles for building sustainable reporting systems in order to be able to successfully implement the ETF.

Suggested Citation

  • Temuulen Murun & Chisa Umemiya & Takashi Morimoto & Tomohiko Hattori, 2023. "Practical Solutions for Addressing Challenges in National Reporting for the Enhanced Transparency Framework: Cases from Developing Countries in the Asia–Pacific Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-14, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:20:p:14771-:d:1257876
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/20/14771/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/20/14771/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aarti Gupta & Sylvia Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen & Nila Kamil & Amy Ching & Nadia Bernaz, 2021. "Performing accountability: face-to-face account-giving in multilateral climate transparency processes," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(5), pages 616-634, May.
    2. Sophie Louise Gladov & Iben Nathan & Morten Pedersen, 2020. "Towards Enhanced Transparency in Non-Annex 1 Countries? Challenges and Options for Measurement and Reporting in Georgia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-18, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:20:p:14771-:d:1257876. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.