IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i14p11056-d1194438.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Scavenger Activity and Anti-Predator Behaviour in an Apennine Wolf Area

Author

Listed:
  • Sophie Ståhlberg

    (Dipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy)

  • Marco Apollonio

    (Dipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy)

Abstract

Scavenging guilds often have several trophic levels with varying dominance and intra-guild predation, competition, and interaction. Apex predators can control subordinate predators by limiting their numbers and affecting behaviour but also supply a continuous food source by abandoning carcasses. Camera traps monitored the scavenger guild in Alpe di Catenaia, Tuscan Apennine, for three years to determine intraguild interactions and the behaviour response. Wild boar visited most feeding sites but only scavenged in 1.4% of their visits. Red fox was the most frequent scavenger, traded vigilance and feeding equally, and selected low vegetation density, while marten invested more in feeding than vigilance. Marten was the prime follower, appearing within the shortest time after another scavenger had left the site. Red fox occasionally looked upwards, possibly to detect birds of prey. Badger showed scarcely any vigilance, did not feed much on carcasses but scent-marked abundantly. Wolves showed the highest vigilance in proportion to feeding at carcasses among the scavengers. Sites with good visibility were selected by all scavengers except martens who selected poor visibility and new moon illumination. Scavengers were mostly nocturnal, showed weak responses to twilight hours or lunar illumination, and all but red fox avoided human disturbance areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Sophie Ståhlberg & Marco Apollonio, 2023. "Scavenger Activity and Anti-Predator Behaviour in an Apennine Wolf Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-16, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:11056-:d:1194438
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/14/11056/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/14/11056/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maximilian L Allen & L Mark Elbroch & Christopher C Wilmers & Heiko U Wittmer, 2014. "Trophic Facilitation or Limitation? Comparative Effects of Pumas and Black Bears on the Scavenger Community," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(7), pages 1-10, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:11056-:d:1194438. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.