IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i13p10665-d1188172.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cracking Pattern and Bearing Capacity of Steel Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Single-Layer Tunnel Lining

Author

Listed:
  • Huayun Li

    (School of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Xihua University, Chengdu 610039, China)

  • Yangfan Wu

    (School of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Xihua University, Chengdu 610039, China)

  • Anxiang Zhou

    (School of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Xihua University, Chengdu 610039, China)

  • Feng Lu

    (School of Emergency Management, Xihua University, Chengdu 610039, China
    Key Laboratory of Transportation Tunnel Engineering, Ministry of Education, School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China)

  • Zhongcheng Lei

    (Shenzhen Municipal Design & Research Institute Co., Ltd., Shenzhen 518029, China)

  • Bowen Zeng

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E9, Canada)

  • Kaicheng Zhu

    (School of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Xihua University, Chengdu 610039, China)

Abstract

In recent years, steel fiber-reinforced concrete (SFRC) single-layer linings have been used in tunnel engineering. Compared to plain concrete single-layer linings, SFRC single-layer linings demonstrate enhanced bearing capacity, durability, and sustainability. Existing studies primarily focused on the mechanical properties of SFRC; however, limited investigations have been conducted on the cracking pattern of SFRC linings. This study uses laboratory tests to examine the influence of steel fiber content and aspect ratio on the mechanical properties of concrete, such as compressive strength and elastic modulus. After the recommended content and aspect ratio of steel fiber are proposed through tests, the cracking pattern and safety performance of plain concrete and SFRC linings under surrounding rock pressure are studied using a similar model test. The test results indicate that the recommended steel fiber volume fraction and aspect ratio for CF35 SFRC are 0.58% and 70, respectively. Due to the effect of loose load, cracks initially develop on the inside of arch crowns in both plain concrete and SFRC single-layer linings. Subsequently, new cracks appear on the inside of the lining floor and the outside of the two wall feet. Numerous narrow cracks with rugged and winding expansion paths can be found on SFRC single-layer linings. Conversely, plain concrete single-layer linings exhibit fewer cracks with larger widths along a straighter path. The initial cracking load of a single-layer lining made of plain concrete is 0.027 MPa, whereas for a single-layer lining made of SFRC, it is 0.04 MPa. This indicates that SFRC can effectively enhance the initial cracking load of lining structures. In the event of damage to the lining, the most critical area for the plain concrete single-layer lining is at the two wall feet, where the minimum safety factor is 1.66. However, for the SFRC lining in the same location, the safety factor is 2.7, resulting in a 62.7% increase in safety.

Suggested Citation

  • Huayun Li & Yangfan Wu & Anxiang Zhou & Feng Lu & Zhongcheng Lei & Bowen Zeng & Kaicheng Zhu, 2023. "Cracking Pattern and Bearing Capacity of Steel Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Single-Layer Tunnel Lining," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-24, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10665-:d:1188172
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10665/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10665/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10665-:d:1188172. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.