IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i13p10362-d1184026.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation Study on the Layout of Community Senior Living Facilities in the Main Area of Shanghai from the Perspective of Senior Life Circle

Author

Listed:
  • Ning Wang

    (School of Design, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200240, China)

  • Wenjun Ma

    (School of Design, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200240, China
    China Institute for Urban Governance, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200030, China)

Abstract

The senior life circle is the basic unit space for building a high quality of senior living in the city, and the service level of the community senior facilities within it is directly related to the daily quality of life of the elderly residents. From the perspective of daily life needs, this study constructs a community senior living facility system consisting of “three levels, six categories and fourteen items”. Taking the main urban area of Shanghai as an example, the relationship between the supply and demand of community senior facilities and senior residents is studied from two perspectives: facility coverage and facility accessibility. The results show that: (1) the community senior living facilities system needs to be improved; (2) there are large gaps in the configuration of care facilities and living facilities; (3) the number of facilities served per capita shows the characteristics of “high value concentration in the center, middle value concentration in the transition area, and peripheral mixed”. The study recommends improving the construction of the facility system, broadening the service supply channels, enhancing the accessibility of facilities by grading and zoning, and promoting the sharing of facilities across administrative boundaries.

Suggested Citation

  • Ning Wang & Wenjun Ma, 2023. "Evaluation Study on the Layout of Community Senior Living Facilities in the Main Area of Shanghai from the Perspective of Senior Life Circle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-19, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10362-:d:1184026
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10362/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10362/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10362-:d:1184026. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.