IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i11p9044-d1163193.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Teaching Methods in Medical Education: An Analysis of the Assessments and Preferences of Students

Author

Listed:
  • Conrado A. Fernández-Rodríguez

    (Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain)

  • M. Carmen Arenas-Fenollar

    (Department of Psychobiology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain)

  • Irene Lacruz-Pérez

    (Department of Education and School Management, Faculty of Teacher Training, University of Valencia, 46022 Valencia, Spain)

  • Raúl Tárraga-Mínguez

    (Department of Education and School Management, Faculty of Teacher Training, University of Valencia, 46022 Valencia, Spain)

Abstract

Knowing which teaching methods students value the most is important, as it directly affects the quality of learning. This paper analyzes which teaching methods are most commonly used in the Medicine Degree at a Spanish university, as perceived by both professors and students. It further explores the students’ assessments of these methods and the relationship between these assessments and the methods’ frequencies of use. The participants were 36 professors and 150 students. Professors completed the Teaching and Assessment Methodology of University Faculty Questionnaire (TAMUFQ), while students were administered a specially designed questionnaire. The questionnaire defined twelve teaching methods, and students were asked to provide their personal assessment and the frequency of use for each method based on their experiences. Professors reported adhering to a traditional style of teaching and assessment. According to the students, the most commonly used method was the lecture, although their assessments of lectures were significantly lower than the frequency with which that method was being used. Regarding the eleven remaining methods, the prospective doctors’ assessments were significantly higher than the methods’ degree of use. The main conclusion is that, while students did not negatively assess lectures, they considered them to be overused. This may mean that the potential of other teaching methods is being missed.

Suggested Citation

  • Conrado A. Fernández-Rodríguez & M. Carmen Arenas-Fenollar & Irene Lacruz-Pérez & Raúl Tárraga-Mínguez, 2023. "Teaching Methods in Medical Education: An Analysis of the Assessments and Preferences of Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-11, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:11:p:9044-:d:1163193
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/11/9044/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/11/9044/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:11:p:9044-:d:1163193. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.