IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i11p8645-d1156513.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study on the Style Design and Anchoring Mechanism of Enlarged Head Anchors

Author

Listed:
  • Sifeng Zhang

    (School of Transportation Engineering, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan 250101, China)

  • Yushuai Wang

    (School of Transportation Engineering, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan 250101, China)

  • Chao Li

    (School of Transportation Engineering, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan 250101, China)

  • Changwei Wang

    (Shandong Luqiao Group Co., Ltd., Jinan 250014, China)

  • Guojian Zhang

    (School of Surveying and Geo-Informatics, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan 250101, China)

  • Shengzhi Sun

    (Shandong Hi-Speed Constructon Management Group Co., Ltd., Jinan 250014, China)

Abstract

To resolve insufficient traditional bolt supports due to the complexity of geological conditions, the optimal design of an expanded head bolt was investigated by using theoretical calculations and experiments. The results show that the drawing capacity of an expanded head bolt is affected by the bearing capacity of front and rear ends, side bearing capacity, and side friction resistance. For a circular anchor bolt, stepped anchor bolt, and semi-ellipsoidal anchor bolt, with an increase in the front section’s radius, the lateral friction resistance of the inner anchor section is gradually shared by the bearing force of the front end of the inner anchor section; the bearing effect of the front end of the inner anchor section is enhanced; and the pulling performance of the anchor bolt is enhanced. Therefore, the pulling force of the circular anchor bolt is at the maximum, followed by the stepped anchor bolt, and the semi-ellipsoidal bolt is at the minimum. The increase in the rear section can provide greater lateral friction resistance and end-bearing force. Compared with cylindrical enlarged head anchors, the circular, stepped, and semi-elliptic enlarged head anchors have a smaller front section but a larger rear section, and the reduction in the front section’s bearing capacity is less than the increase in the side bearing capacity and rear-end bearing capacity; thus, the cylindrical bolt has the lowest pulling force. Compared with the front radius, the back radius has more influence on the drawing ability of the enlarged head anchor. The longer the inner anchorage section, the larger the distribution range in the compression zone that is formed in the soil body and the smaller the range in the tension zone that is formed in the rear. The increase in the length of the inner anchorage section is conducive to improving the reinforcement effect of the soil in front of the anchorage section in the bolt. Therefore, this parameter plays an important role in the redistribution of the soil in front of the force. The ultimate pull-out force of a circular table-shaped tensile bolt is the highest, followed by the stepped bolt, and the semi-elliptic bolt comes in third, with the cylindrical bolt exhibiting the lowest pull-out force; the circular table-shaped enlarged head anchor constitutes the best style design.

Suggested Citation

  • Sifeng Zhang & Yushuai Wang & Chao Li & Changwei Wang & Guojian Zhang & Shengzhi Sun, 2023. "Study on the Style Design and Anchoring Mechanism of Enlarged Head Anchors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-31, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:11:p:8645-:d:1156513
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/11/8645/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/11/8645/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:11:p:8645-:d:1156513. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.