IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i10p8055-d1147612.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on Geological Safety Evaluation Index Systems and Methods for Assessing Underground Space in Coastal Bedrock Cities Based on a Back-Propagation Neural Network Comprehensive Evaluation–Analytic Hierarchy Process (BPCE-AHP)

Author

Listed:
  • Yuting Zhao

    (Qingdao Geo-Engineering Surveying Institute (Qingdao Geological Exploration Development Bureau), Qingdao 266071, China
    Key Laboratory of Geological Safety of Coastal Urban Underground Space, Ministry of Natural Resources, Qingdao 266101, China)

  • Honghua Liu

    (Qingdao Geo-Engineering Surveying Institute (Qingdao Geological Exploration Development Bureau), Qingdao 266071, China
    Key Laboratory of Geological Safety of Coastal Urban Underground Space, Ministry of Natural Resources, Qingdao 266101, China)

  • Wanlong Qu

    (Qingdao Geo-Engineering Surveying Institute (Qingdao Geological Exploration Development Bureau), Qingdao 266071, China
    Key Laboratory of Geological Safety of Coastal Urban Underground Space, Ministry of Natural Resources, Qingdao 266101, China)

  • Pengyu Luan

    (Qingdao Geo-Engineering Surveying Institute (Qingdao Geological Exploration Development Bureau), Qingdao 266071, China
    Key Laboratory of Geological Safety of Coastal Urban Underground Space, Ministry of Natural Resources, Qingdao 266101, China)

  • Jing Sun

    (Qingdao Institute of Marine Geology, China Geological Survey, Qingdao 266237, China
    Laboratory for Marine Mineral Resources, Laoshan Laboratory, Qingdao 266237, China)

Abstract

With the rapid development of the economy in China, the scale and quantity of urban underground space development continue to grow rapidly; as such, geological safety problems in urban underground space development and utilization are a research hotspot at present. Therefore, it is important to establish a high-quality evaluation index system and method for assessing the geological safety of urban underground spaces in coastal bedrock. Taking the typical area of Qingdao as an example, this study establishes an effective system for evaluating the geological safety of urban underground space according to the geological background, hydrogeology, engineering geology, and unfavorable geological phenomena in the Hongdao Economic Zone of Qingdao. Then, the method of evaluating the geological safety of urban underground space was studied. Through a comprehensive analysis and comparison of the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation–analytic hierarchy process (FCE-AHP), the grey relation comprehensive evaluation–analytic hierarchy process (GRCE-AHP), the matter-element comprehensive evaluation–analytic hierarchy process (MECE-AHP), and the back-propagation neural network comprehensive evaluation–analytic hierarchy process (BPCE-AHP), it was determined that the back-propagation neural network comprehensive evaluation–analytic hierarchy process (BPCE-AHP) was an ideal method for evaluating the geological safety of underground space in Qingdao’s coastal bedrock area. This method was used to evaluate the geological safety of the study area, and the evaluation results were verified; this further proved the practicability and rationality of the back-propagation neural network comprehensive evaluation–analytic hierarchy process (BPCE-AHP).

Suggested Citation

  • Yuting Zhao & Honghua Liu & Wanlong Qu & Pengyu Luan & Jing Sun, 2023. "Research on Geological Safety Evaluation Index Systems and Methods for Assessing Underground Space in Coastal Bedrock Cities Based on a Back-Propagation Neural Network Comprehensive Evaluation–Analyti," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-21, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:10:p:8055-:d:1147612
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/10/8055/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/10/8055/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:10:p:8055-:d:1147612. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.