IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2022i1p619-d1019458.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ground Reaction of Lightly Overconsolidated Subsoil in Reinforced Piled Embankment under Cyclic Loads

Author

Listed:
  • Yan Zhuang

    (Department of Road and Bridge Engineering, School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan 430068, China
    Key Laboratory of Concrete and Prestressed Concrete Structures of Ministry of Education, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China)

  • Xiangwei Song

    (Department of Road and Bridge Engineering, School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan 430068, China)

  • Kangyu Wang

    (School of Civil Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310014, China)

Abstract

Subsoil support is generally ignored in the design of reinforced piled embankments, resulting in a very conservative design for settlement control. This design philosophy may lead to an unnecessary increase in construction costs, especially for embankments constructed over subsoil of medium and high compressibility (i.e., compression index of subsoil larger than 0.2). This paper presents the ground reaction of lightly overconsolidated subsoil in a reinforced piled embankment subjected to cyclic loads for the purpose of investigating the general behavior of lightly overconsolidated subsoil, and it promotes the sustainable development of piled embankment technology. The ground reaction of subsoil under both static and cyclic loads was comprehensively analyzed in terms of settlement and incremental vertical stress, which exhibited approximately the same profile. However, the settlement of lightly overconsolidated subsoil under a cyclic load was 23% larger than that under a static load. A parametric study was then performed under cyclic loads, and the results showed that the vertical stress carried by the subsoil was the most sensitive to the pile spacing amongst all the parameters considered in this paper. The analysis demonstrated an approximately 88% increase in stress when spacing was enlarged from 2.0 to 3.0 m. Finally, a modified analytical method for the ground reaction of lightly overconsolidated subsoil under cyclic loads was presented, and it showed reasonable agreement with the numerical simulation, particularly for relatively low geogrid stiffnesses, low embankment height (<6.5 m), and small pile spacing (e.g., 2–3 m center to center).

Suggested Citation

  • Yan Zhuang & Xiangwei Song & Kangyu Wang, 2022. "Ground Reaction of Lightly Overconsolidated Subsoil in Reinforced Piled Embankment under Cyclic Loads," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:619-:d:1019458
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/619/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/619/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:619-:d:1019458. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.