IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2022i1p615-d1019442.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Analysis of Seismic Design Codes for Shallow Foundations Adhering to the Kazakhstani and European Approaches

Author

Listed:
  • Assel Zhanabayeva

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Nazarbayev University, 53, Kabanbay Batyr Ave, 010000 Astana, Kazakhstan)

  • Sung-Woo Moon

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Nazarbayev University, 53, Kabanbay Batyr Ave, 010000 Astana, Kazakhstan)

  • James Innocent Ocheme

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Nazarbayev University, 53, Kabanbay Batyr Ave, 010000 Astana, Kazakhstan)

  • Yeraly Shokbarov

    (Kazakh Research and Design Institute of Construction and Architecture (KazNIISA), 21, Solodovnikov Ave, 050000 Almaty, Kazakhstan)

  • Vitaliy Khomyakov

    (Kazakh Research and Design Institute of Construction and Architecture (KazNIISA), 21, Solodovnikov Ave, 050000 Almaty, Kazakhstan)

  • Jong Kim

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Nazarbayev University, 53, Kabanbay Batyr Ave, 010000 Astana, Kazakhstan)

  • Alfrendo Satyanaga

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Nazarbayev University, 53, Kabanbay Batyr Ave, 010000 Astana, Kazakhstan)

Abstract

Since 2015 the transition from the traditional seismic design regulation to the newly developed code of practice has been initiated in Kazakhstan. The introduced regulatory system involves the application of the European approach for the seismic design of buildings and structures on the territory of Kazakhstan. This study aims to present a comparative analysis of seismic design codes applied in Kazakhstan (i.e., SP RK 5.01-102-2013* Foundations of Buildings and Structures and SP RK 2.03-30-2017* Construction in Seismic Regions) and SP RK EN 1998-5:2004/2012 Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance, identical to Eurocode 8 (EC8). One of the critical aspects of the research investigates the difficulties of integrating European design standards into the local regulatory system. The necessity of applying the European approach considering the geotechnical features of the country provided in the National Annex (NA) is defined and proved. The designed codes of practice are also compared in terms of conservativeness, when considering a design problem verifying the seismic bearing capacity of a shallow foundation in Almaty city.

Suggested Citation

  • Assel Zhanabayeva & Sung-Woo Moon & James Innocent Ocheme & Yeraly Shokbarov & Vitaliy Khomyakov & Jong Kim & Alfrendo Satyanaga, 2022. "Comparative Analysis of Seismic Design Codes for Shallow Foundations Adhering to the Kazakhstani and European Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:615-:d:1019442
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/615/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/615/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:615-:d:1019442. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.