IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i9p5549-d808883.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development and Comparison of Prediction Models for Sanitary Sewer Pipes Condition Assessment Using Multinomial Logistic Regression and Artificial Neural Network

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Ogaro Atambo

    (Center for Underground Infrastructure Research and Education (CUIRE), Department of Civil Engineering, The University of Texas at Arlington, P.O. Box 19308, Arlington, TX 76019, USA)

  • Mohammad Najafi

    (Center for Underground Infrastructure Research and Education (CUIRE), Department of Civil Engineering, The University of Texas at Arlington, P.O. Box 19308, Arlington, TX 76019, USA)

  • Vinayak Kaushal

    (Center for Underground Infrastructure Research and Education (CUIRE), Department of Civil Engineering, The University of Texas at Arlington, P.O. Box 19308, Arlington, TX 76019, USA)

Abstract

Sanitary sewer pipes infrastructure system being in good condition is essential for providing safe conveyance of the wastewater from homes, businesses, and industries to the wastewater treatment plants. For sanitary sewer pipes to deliver the wastewater to the treatment plants, they must be in good condition. Most of the water utilities have aged sanitary sewer pipes. Water utilities inspect sewer pipes to decide which segments of the sanitary sewer pipes need rehabilitation or replacement. The process of inspecting the sewer pipes is described as condition assessment. This condition assessment process is costly and necessitates developing a model that predicts the condition rating of sanitary sewer pipes. The objective of this study is to develop Multinomial Logistic Regression (MLR) and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) models to predict sanitary sewer pipes condition rating using inspection and condition assessment data. MLR and ANN models are developed from the City of Dallas’s data. The MLR model is built using 80% of randomly selected data and validated using the remaining 20% of data. The ANN model is trained, validated, and tested. The significant physical factors influencing sanitary pipes condition rating include diameter, age, pipe material, and length. Soil type is the environmental factor that influences sanitary sewer pipes condition rating. The accuracy of the performance of the MLR and ANN is found to be 75% and 85%, respectively. This study contributes to the body of knowledge by developing models to predict sanitary sewer pipes condition rating that enables policymakers and sanitary sewer utilities managers to prioritize the sanitary sewer pipes to be rehabilitated and/or replaced.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Ogaro Atambo & Mohammad Najafi & Vinayak Kaushal, 2022. "Development and Comparison of Prediction Models for Sanitary Sewer Pipes Condition Assessment Using Multinomial Logistic Regression and Artificial Neural Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:5549-:d:808883
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/9/5549/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/9/5549/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Angeliki Peponi & Paulo Morgado & Jorge Trindade, 2019. "Combining Artificial Neural Networks and GIS Fundamentals for Coastal Erosion Prediction Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-14, February.
    2. Stian Bruaset & Håkon Rygg & Sveinung Sægrov, 2018. "Reviewing the Long-Term Sustainability of Urban Water System Rehabilitation Strategies with an Alternative Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-30, June.
    3. Peng Hou & Xiaojian Yi & Haiping Dong, 2020. "A Spatial Statistic Based Risk Assessment Approach to Prioritize the Pipeline Inspection of the Pipeline Network," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-16, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yilin Zhao & Feng He & Ying Feng, 2022. "Research on the Current Situation of Employment Mobility and Retention Rate Predictions of “Double First-Class” University Graduates Based on the Random Forest and BP Neural Network Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-22, July.
    2. Xuming Zeng & Zinan Wang & Hao Wang & Shengyan Zhu & Shaofeng Chen, 2023. "Progress in Drainage Pipeline Condition Assessment and Deterioration Prediction Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-29, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Constantinos A. Balaras & Andreas I. Theodoropoulos & Elena G. Dascalaki, 2023. "Geographic Information Systems for Facilitating Audits of the Urban Built Environment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-26, May.
    2. Wan Zhang & Ruihao Shen & Ning Xu & Haoran Zhang & Yongtu Liang, 2020. "Study on Optimization of Active Control Schemes for Considering Transient Processes in the Case of Pipeline Leakage," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-16, April.
    3. Juliana Mio de Souza & Paulo Morgado & Eduarda Marques da Costa & Luiz Fernando de Novaes Vianna, 2022. "Modeling of Land Use and Land Cover (LULC) Change Based on Artificial Neural Networks for the Chapecó River Ecological Corridor, Santa Catarina/Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-23, March.
    4. Marcell Kupi & Eszter Szemerédi, 2021. "Impact of the COVID-19 on the Destination Choices of Hungarian Tourists: A Comparative Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-17, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:5549-:d:808883. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.