IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i9p5109-d800721.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Soil Organic Carbon Sequestration under Long-Term Chemical and Manure Fertilization in a Cinnamon Soil, Northern China

Author

Listed:
  • Yun Xiang

    (College of Resources and Environment, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong 030801, China
    Institute of Loess Plateau, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China)

  • Man Cheng

    (Institute of Loess Plateau, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China)

  • Yongli Wen

    (Institute of Loess Plateau, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China)

  • Frédéric Darboux

    (Université Grenoble Alpes, INRAE, ETNA, F-38402 St-Martin-d’Hères, France)

Abstract

To mitigate climate change and improve food security, it is essential to understand how fertilizer strategies impact the dynamics of soil organic carbon and its fractions. The soil organic carbon (SOC), light fraction organic carbon (LFOC), and particulate organic carbon (POC) were investigated every five years in a corn ( Zea mays L.) cropping system with chemical fertilization and manuring over twenty-four years (1992–2016) in a semiarid area of northern China. There were four treatments with chemical fertilizer (i.e., N1P1, N2P2, N3P3, N4P4), three treatments with chemical fertilizer plus manure (i.e., N2P1M1, N3P2M3, N4P2M2), and one treatment with manure alone (i.e., M6), and an unfertilized treatment (control). The carbon sequestration rate ( C SR ) and efficiency ( C SE ) of SOC, POC, and LFOC were identified. The results revealed that the fertilization treatments (N2P2, N3P3, N2P1M1, N3P2M3, N4P2M2, and M6) promoted SOC sequestration, with a sequestration rate of 0.19~1.29 Mg ha −1 y −1 . The excess application of chemical fertilizer caused a reduction in POC, whereas the application of NP, NPM or manure resulted in greater POC sequestration in soil, with a carbon sequestration rate of 0.04~0.24 Mg ha −1 y −1 . The LFOC stocks were 1.43~2.24 Mg ha −1 under the NP treatments, 2.47~6.68 Mg ha −1 under the NPM treatments and 8.12 Mg ha −1 under the M treatment; these stocks were all higher than that of the control treatment. Different fertilization strategies affected the pools of SOC with different sequestration rates. We found the carbon sequestration rates of SOC and LFOC were logarithmically correlated with the annual carbon input. When the annual C input is approximately 1.39 Mg ha −1 y −1 , the SOC level will be maintained; when the annual C input is higher than 0.8 Mg ha −1 y −1 , the LFOC level increases. This study describes the relationship between carbon inputs and the SOC(LFOC) sequestration rates under continuous fertilization in arid cropland. The results further evidence that the long-term fertilization of NPM and M increases the potential for SOC sequestration and quantifies the amount of exogenous carbon input required for soil organic matter enhancement.

Suggested Citation

  • Yun Xiang & Man Cheng & Yongli Wen & Frédéric Darboux, 2022. "Soil Organic Carbon Sequestration under Long-Term Chemical and Manure Fertilization in a Cinnamon Soil, Northern China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-13, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:5109-:d:800721
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/9/5109/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/9/5109/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:5109-:d:800721. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.