IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i9p5059-d800034.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Advances in Technological Research for Online and In Situ Water Quality Monitoring—A Review

Author

Listed:
  • Gabriel Marinho e Silva

    (Department of Hydraulics Engineering and Sanitation, São Carlos School of Engineering, University of São Paulo, São Carlos 13566-590, Brazil)

  • Daiane Ferreira Campos

    (Department of Hydraulics Engineering and Sanitation, São Carlos School of Engineering, University of São Paulo, São Carlos 13566-590, Brazil)

  • José Artur Teixeira Brasil

    (College of Engineering and Integrated Design (CEID), University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78249, USA)

  • Marcel Tremblay

    (Department of Correction, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Milford, MA 01757, USA)

  • Eduardo Mario Mendiondo

    (Department of Hydraulics Engineering and Sanitation, São Carlos School of Engineering, University of São Paulo, São Carlos 13566-590, Brazil)

  • Filippo Ghiglieno

    (Department of Physics, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos 13565-905, Brazil)

Abstract

Monitoring water quality is an essential tool for the control of pollutants and pathogens that can cause damage to the environment and human health. However, water quality analysis is usually performed in laboratory environments, often with the use of high-cost equipment and qualified professionals. With the progress of nanotechnology and the advance in engineering materials, several studies have shown, in recent years, the development of technologies aimed at monitoring water quality, with the ability to reduce the costs of analysis and accelerate the achievement of results for management and decision-making. In this work, a review was carried out on several low-cost developed technologies and applied in situ for water quality monitoring. Thus, new alternative technologies for the main physical (color, temperature, and turbidity), chemical (chlorine, fluorine, phosphorus, metals, nitrogen, dissolved oxygen, pH, and oxidation–reduction potential), and biological (total coliforms, Escherichia coli , algae, and cyanobacteria) water quality parameters were described. It was observed that there has been an increase in the number of publications related to the topic in recent years, mainly since 2012, with 641 studies being published in 2021. The main new technologies developed are based on optical or electrochemical sensors, however, due to the recent development of these technologies, more robust analyses and evaluations in real conditions are essential to guarantee the precision and repeatability of the methods, especially when it is desirable to compare the values with government regulatory standards.

Suggested Citation

  • Gabriel Marinho e Silva & Daiane Ferreira Campos & José Artur Teixeira Brasil & Marcel Tremblay & Eduardo Mario Mendiondo & Filippo Ghiglieno, 2022. "Advances in Technological Research for Online and In Situ Water Quality Monitoring—A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-28, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:5059-:d:800034
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/9/5059/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/9/5059/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Emily Bedell & Taylor Sharpe & Timothy Purvis & Joe Brown & Evan Thomas, 2020. "Demonstration of Tryptophan-Like Fluorescence Sensor Concepts for Fecal Exposure Detection in Drinking Water in Remote and Resource Constrained Settings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-11, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jorge Alejandro Silva, 2022. "Implementation and Integration of Sustainability in the Water Industry: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-28, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:5059-:d:800034. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.