IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i8p4629-d792680.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining English Ability-Grouping Practices by Aligning CEFR Levels with University-Level General English Courses in Taiwan

Author

Listed:
  • Li-Tang Yu

    (Department of English Instruction, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu City 300193, Taiwan)

  • Mei-Ching Chen

    (Holistic Education Center, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City 242062, Taiwan)

  • Chao-Wen Chiu

    (Holistic Education Center, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City 242062, Taiwan)

  • Chien-Che Hsu

    (Holistic Education Center, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City 242062, Taiwan)

  • Yun-Pi Yuan

    (Department of English Language and Literature, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City 242062, Taiwan)

Abstract

In higher education in Taiwan, mandatory general English courses like Freshman English adopt ability-grouping practices to assign students to classes of different proficiency levels. However, little research has explored the efficacy of ability-grouping criteria and standardized the language-proficiency description for general English courses of different proficiency levels. Thus, this study recruited 806 Taiwanese undergraduates from Freshman English classes of advanced, intermediate, and basic proficiency levels to take the Oxford Online Placement Test (OOPT), and compared their scores on the Joint College Entrance Examination English subject (namely the General Scholastic Ability Test, GSAT) with OOPT. The findings indicated that the ability-grouping criterion was effective to classify students into three groups of different proficiency levels. A positive relationship between the GSAT and OOPT scores was identified. A clear trend, but with some overlapping correspondence, was displayed between the class levels and Common European Framework of Reference levels derived from the OOPT scoring report. Pedagogical implications and suggestions for future studies are provided.

Suggested Citation

  • Li-Tang Yu & Mei-Ching Chen & Chao-Wen Chiu & Chien-Che Hsu & Yun-Pi Yuan, 2022. "Examining English Ability-Grouping Practices by Aligning CEFR Levels with University-Level General English Courses in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-13, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:8:p:4629-:d:792680
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/8/4629/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/8/4629/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li-Tang Yu, 2022. "A Comparison of the Autonomous Use of Technology for Language Learning for EFL University Students of Different Proficiency Levels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:8:p:4629-:d:792680. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.