IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i7p3944-d780516.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bioremediation of 27 Micropollutants by Symbiotic Microorganisms of Wetland Macrophytes

Author

Listed:
  • Hana Brunhoferova

    (Department of Engineering, Campus Kirchberg, University of Luxembourg, 6, Rue Coudenhove-Kalergi, L-1359 Luxembourg, Luxembourg)

  • Silvia Venditti

    (Department of Engineering, Campus Kirchberg, University of Luxembourg, 6, Rue Coudenhove-Kalergi, L-1359 Luxembourg, Luxembourg)

  • Cédric C. Laczny

    (Systems Ecology Group, Luxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine, Campus Belval, University of Luxembourg, 7, Avenue des Hauts Fourneaux, L-4362 Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg)

  • Laura Lebrun

    (Systems Ecology Group, Luxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine, Campus Belval, University of Luxembourg, 7, Avenue des Hauts Fourneaux, L-4362 Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg)

  • Joachim Hansen

    (Department of Engineering, Campus Kirchberg, University of Luxembourg, 6, Rue Coudenhove-Kalergi, L-1359 Luxembourg, Luxembourg)

Abstract

Background: Micropollutants in bodies of water represent many challenges. We addressed these challenges by the application of constructed wetlands, which represent advanced treatment technology for the removal of micropollutants from water. However, which mechanisms specifically contribute to the removal efficiency often remains unclear. Methods: Here, we focus on the removal of 27 micropollutants by bioremediation. For this, macrophytes Phragmites australis , Iris pseudacorus and Lythrum salicaria were taken from established wetlands, and a special experimental set-up was designed. In order to better understand the impact of the rhizosphere microbiome, we determined the microbial composition using 16S rRNA gene sequencing and investigated the role of identified genera in the micropollutant removal of micropollutants. Moreover, we studied the colonization of macrophyte roots by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, which are known for their symbiotic relationship with plants. This symbiosis could result in increased removal of present micropollutants. Results: We found Iris pseudacorus to be the most successful bioremediative system, as it removed 22 compounds, including persistent ones, with more than 80% efficiency. The most abundant genera that contributed to the removal of micropollutants were Pseudomonas, Flavobacterium, Variovorax, Methylotenera, Reyranella, Amaricoccus and Hydrogenophaga . Iris pseudacorus exhibited the highest colonization rate (56%). Conclusions: Our experiments demonstrate the positive impact of rhizosphere microorganisms on the removal of micropollutants.

Suggested Citation

  • Hana Brunhoferova & Silvia Venditti & Cédric C. Laczny & Laura Lebrun & Joachim Hansen, 2022. "Bioremediation of 27 Micropollutants by Symbiotic Microorganisms of Wetland Macrophytes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-16, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:7:p:3944-:d:780516
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/7/3944/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/7/3944/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sonja Knapp & Sebastian Schmauck & Andreas Zehnsdorf, 2019. "Biodiversity Impact of Green Roofs and Constructed Wetlands as Progressive Eco-Technologies in Urban Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-26, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Olivia Celeste Overton & Leif Hans Olson & Sreemala Das Majumder & Hani Shwiyyat & Mary Elizabeth Foltz & Robert William Nairn, 2023. "Wetland Removal Mechanisms for Emerging Contaminants," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-37, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Antonia Longobardi & Roberta D’Ambrosio & Mirka Mobilia, 2019. "Predicting Stormwater Retention Capacity of Green Roofs: An Experimental Study of the Roles of Climate, Substrate Soil Moisture, and Drainage Layer Properties," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Yanqin Zhang & Xianli You & Shanjun Huang & Minhua Wang & Jianwen Dong, 2022. "Knowledge Atlas on the Relationship between Water Management and Constructed Wetlands—A Bibliometric Analysis Based on CiteSpace," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-28, July.
    3. Ingo Kowarik & Leonie K. Fischer & Dave Kendal, 2020. "Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Urban Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-8, June.
    4. Elena Giacomello & Jacopo Gaspari, 2021. "Hydrologic Performance of an Extensive Green Roof under Intense Rain Events: Results from a Rain-Chamber Simulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-23, March.
    5. Hsin Rau & Mary Deanne M. Lagapa & Po-Hsun Chen, 2021. "Anticipatory Non-Green-Phenomena Determination for Designing Eco-Design Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-16, January.
    6. Mariusz Starzec & Józef Dziopak, 2020. "A Case Study of the Retention Efficiency of a Traditional and Innovative Drainage System," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-19, September.
    7. Rocío Pineda-Martos & Cristina S. C. Calheiros, 2021. "Nature-Based Solutions in Cities—Contribution of the Portuguese National Association of Green Roofs to Urban Circularity," Circular Economy and Sustainability,, Springer.
    8. Agnieszka Karczmarczyk & Anna Baryła & Daniel Szejba & Barbara Miechowicz & Radosław Amroziński & Marcin Ciuraj, 2023. "Quantitative, Qualitative and Thermal Aspects of Rainwater Retention on Wetland Roofs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-14, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:7:p:3944-:d:780516. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.