IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i6p3349-d769998.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Skills of Medium-Range Precipitation Forecasts in the Senegal River Basin

Author

Listed:
  • Mekonnen Gebremichael

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA)

  • Haowen Yue

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA)

  • Vahid Nourani

    (Center of Excellence in Hydroinformatics and Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Tabriz, 29 Bahman Ave., Tabriz 5166616471, Iran
    Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Near East University, Near East Boulevard, Via Mersin 10, Nicosia 99138, Turkey)

  • Richard Damoah

    (National Aeronautics and Space Administration/Goddard Space Flight Center (NASA/GSFC), Morgan State University, Mail Code: 618, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA)

Abstract

Reliable information on medium-range (1–15 day) precipitation forecasts is useful in reservoir operation, among many other applications. Such forecasts are increasingly becoming available from global models. The skills of medium-range precipitation forecasts derived from Global Forecast System (GFS) are assessed in the Senegal River Basin, focusing on the watershed its major hydropower dams: Manantali (located in relatively wet, Southern Sudan climate and mountainous region), Foum Gleita (relatively dry, Sahel climate and low-elevation), and Diama (a large watershed covering almost the entire basin, dominated by Sahel climate). IMERG Final, a satellite product involving rain gauge data for bias correction, is used as reference. GFS has the ability capture the overall spatial and monthly pattern of rainfall in the region. However, GFS tends to overestimate rainfall in the wet parts of the region, and slightly underestimate in the dry part. The skill of daily GFS forecast is low over Manantali (Kling-Gupta Efficiency, KGE of 0.29), but slightly higher over Foum Gleita (KGE of 0.53) and Diama (KGE of 0.59). For 15-day accumulation, GFS forecast shows higher skill over Manantali (KGE of 0.60) and Diama (KGE of 0.79) but does not change much over Foul Gleita (KGE of 0.51) compared to daily rainfall forecasts. IMERG Early, a satellite-only product available at near-real time, has better performance than GFS. This study suggests the need for further improving the accuracy of GFS forecasts, and identifies IMERG Early as a potential source of data that can help in this effort.

Suggested Citation

  • Mekonnen Gebremichael & Haowen Yue & Vahid Nourani & Richard Damoah, 2022. "The Skills of Medium-Range Precipitation Forecasts in the Senegal River Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-14, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:6:p:3349-:d:769998
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/6/3349/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/6/3349/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sarah Alexander & Guang Yang & Girmachew Addisu & Paul Block, 2021. "Forecast-informed reservoir operations to guide hydropower and agriculture allocations in the Blue Nile basin, Ethiopia," International Journal of Water Resources Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(2), pages 208-233, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Muhammad Umer Nadeem & Muhammad Naveed Anjum & Arslan Afzal & Muhammad Azam & Fiaz Hussain & Muhammad Usman & Muhammad Mashood Javaid & Muhammad Ahsan Mukhtar & Faizan Majeed, 2022. "Assessment of Multi-Satellite Precipitation Products over the Himalayan Mountains of Pakistan, South Asia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-24, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:6:p:3349-:d:769998. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.