IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i5p2846-d761500.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Recommendations for Effective and Sustainable Regulation of Biopesticides in Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • Christine Abey Ashaolu

    (Chemical Evaluation and Research Directorate, National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control (NAFDAC), Federal Capital Territory, Abuja 900287, Nigeria
    Biopesticides Group, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB), Observatory, Cape Town 7925, South Africa)

  • Chibuzor Onyinye Okonkwo

    (Biopesticides Group, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB), Observatory, Cape Town 7925, South Africa
    Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Calabar, Calabar 540271, Nigeria)

  • Elizabeth Njuguna

    (Biopesticides Group, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB), Observatory, Cape Town 7925, South Africa)

  • Dennis Ndolo

    (Biopesticides Group, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB), Observatory, Cape Town 7925, South Africa)

Abstract

The global trend towards increased demand for organic food, greener environments, and the integration of biological control agents into pest management strategies has greatly enhanced the need for biopesticides. Biopesticides are made from micro-organisms or other natural substances and are, hence, generally environmentally friendly. However, despite their great potential—and in part due to regulatory challenges—relatively few biopesticides have been registered and commercialised in Nigeria compared to other African countries, such as South Africa and Kenya. Biological active agents are so diverse that applying the same safety standards to all of them is almost impossible. A comparative review of risk assessment processes of Nigeria’s biopesticide regulations with other developing African countries (South Africa and Kenya) and developed regions (the European Union and the United States of America) was conducted. Prolonged field testing, lack of bridged risk assessments, and technical checklists were identified as key factors hampering the research and development of biopesticides in Nigeria. Suitable amendments to the existing regulations guiding biopesticide formulation and utilisation in Nigeria are recommended. Risk assessment matrices for microbial and biochemical pesticides and a scientific/technical checklist have also been developed. It is apparent that harmonisation and data exchange among countries in the region could enhance the advancement of scientific and technical knowledge for sustainable regulation of, and cross-border trade in, biopesticides.

Suggested Citation

  • Christine Abey Ashaolu & Chibuzor Onyinye Okonkwo & Elizabeth Njuguna & Dennis Ndolo, 2022. "Recommendations for Effective and Sustainable Regulation of Biopesticides in Nigeria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-14, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:2846-:d:761500
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/2846/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/2846/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:2846-:d:761500. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.