IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i4p2227-d750423.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strengthening Agroecology with the Political Pedagogy of Peasant Organisations: A Case Study of Baserritik Mundura in the Basque Country

Author

Listed:
  • Beatriz Casado

    (Institute of Studies on Development and International Cooperation, University of the Basque Country, Zubiria Etxea, Avda. Lehendakari Agirre, 81, 48015 Bilbao, Spain)

  • Leticia Urretabizkaia

    (Institute of Studies on Development and International Cooperation, University of the Basque Country, Zubiria Etxea, Avda. Lehendakari Agirre, 81, 48015 Bilbao, Spain)

  • Mirene Begiristain-Zubillaga

    (Department of Finance Economy II, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of the Basque Country (UPV-EHU), Plaza de Oñati 1, 20018 Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain)

  • Zesar Martinez

    (Department of Sociology and Social Work, Faculty of Communication and Social Sciences, University of the Basque Country (UPV-EHU), Sarriena, 48940 Leioa, Spain)

Abstract

La Vía Campesina organisations have identified the area of education and training as a strategic and priority arena of intervention to bring about change in the political-pedagogical perspective. This involves rethinking and redesigning the conventional training processes towards the collective experiences of learning, organisation, exchange and living. With this approach in mind, and based on the experiences and educational contributions made by peasant organisations, this paper presents the systematisation of the Baserritik Mundura experience, analysing and sharing the learning derived from this case study and establishing the integral role of the pedagogic proposal as an axis for systematisation. This analysis, from the logic of the systematisation of processes, promulgates the learnings of this agroecological training experience while exposing both its strengths and weaknesses. We present the learning linked to the pedagogic dimensions that, through a cross-over method, aim to create a multidimensional educational environment which transforms our subjectivities, practices and the beliefs that sustain them. This learning is presented in eight main areas related to: (1) organicity, (2) alternation, (3) the mystical and ludic-cultural dimension, (4) the contents, subjects and teaching team, (5) the proposal as a whole and its perspective of popular education and action research, (6) the transversality of the feminist perspective, (7) linguistic plurality and (8) the pedagogic political support of the process. In addition, we present considerations related to the learning identified in the systematisation itself. On the one hand, we look at the lack of training processes in the official university context related to an alternation system with an organicity linked to the territory, and the need for the practical development of a dynamic of the collective construction of knowledge with a view toward transforming the logics that underpin the existing hegemonic ideologies. On the other hand, we point out the need for a debate regarding the epistemological perspective and integral, experiential and emancipatory pedagogical perspectives. Even with their limitations and challenges, these proposals have great potential to train, organise, politicise, excite and connect people from different fields towards the construction of a fairer, healthier and more sustainable agroecological agri-food system, based on food sovereignty and the everyday lives of people

Suggested Citation

  • Beatriz Casado & Leticia Urretabizkaia & Mirene Begiristain-Zubillaga & Zesar Martinez, 2022. "Strengthening Agroecology with the Political Pedagogy of Peasant Organisations: A Case Study of Baserritik Mundura in the Basque Country," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-21, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:2227-:d:750423
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/4/2227/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/4/2227/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:2227-:d:750423. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.