Author
Listed:
- Weihong Chen
(School of Foreign Languages and Literature, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China
School of Foreign Languages, Quanzhou Normal University, Quanzhou 362000, China)
- Junju Wang
(School of Foreign Languages and Literature, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China)
Abstract
Source use by L2 writers is a significant topic of research in L2 writing. However, scant attention has been given to source use by undergraduate post-novice L2 writers. In contrast to undergraduate novice L2 writers who have just arrived at university and who often have little knowledge of source use and academic writing, undergraduate post-novice L2 writers are those who have achieved some proficiency in source use in academic writing assignments and have got some experience of writing from sources as they progress in their university studies (Keck, 2014; Wette, 2017). In this study, we examined source use by Chinese Year 3 undergraduate EFL writers through an analysis of their source use in essays and their perceptions of the challenges and strategies. The instances of source use in essays written by the students (N = 59) were analyzed in terms of source-use types, accuracy, and functions, which were then compared with those by novice and highly experienced writers in other studies. A subset of the students (N = 25) were interviewed to understand their perceptions of the challenges and the strategies in their source-based writing processes. The analysis of the students’ essays revealed that 71.4% of the instances of source use were paraphrases, and the majority of the instances of source use were of satisfactory quality, while a small portion were of poor quality, including exact copying (i.e., plagiarism), patchwriting, omitting references, or misrepresenting source information. The students used sources primarily to introduce or illustrate a point. An analysis of the interviews showed that the students had difficulty in searching for, understanding, and integrating sources and that they employed various strategies to cope with these challenges. This study enriches our understanding of undergraduate post-novice L2 writers’ abilities and the successive challenges when writing from sources, which has implications for the development of academic writing instruction and which will help students address these challenges and facilitate the sustainable development of their abilities to write from sources.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:2108-:d:748037. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.