IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i3p1357-d733405.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of Bacterial Community Structure in PM2.5 within Broiler Houses under Different Rearing Systems in China

Author

Listed:
  • Imran Khan

    (State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Wenxing Wang

    (State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Xiaobin Ye

    (Bureau of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of Luanping County, Chengde 068250, China)

  • Adamu Mani Isa

    (State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China)

  • Muhammad Tariq Khan

    (Department of Science and Environmental Studies, The Education University of Hong Kong, Taipo, New Territories, Hong Kong, China)

  • Renna Sa

    (State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China)

  • Lei Liu

    (State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China)

  • Teng Ma

    (State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China)

  • Hongfu Zhang

    (State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China)

Abstract

Background: In intensive poultry farming, high concentrations of indoor particulate matter (PM) impact production performance and welfare. In this study, PM2.5 level and bacterial community diversity were investigated in a multilayer cage house rearing system (CH) and a net flooring house rearing system (FH) during different growth stages to clarify the effects of the rearing systems on the diversity of airborne bacteria and help improve health management. Methods: The IC and high-throughput sequencing were used for ion composition and bacterial diversity analysis of PM2.5 collected from CH and FH. Results: The concentrations of NH 3 , CO 2 and PM2.5 in CH were significantly lower than FH ( p < 0.001) in both middle and late rearing stages. PM concentrations gradually increased with broiler growth only in FH. The water-soluble ions of PM2.5 samples had no significant difference between the two systems ( p > 0.05). Firmicutes , Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria were the most abundant phyla in both the atmosphere and the broiler houses, but the composition was significantly different. The bacterial community in the broiler houses had strong correlations with temperature, humidity and PM of extremely high concentrations. Ions had stronger correlations with microbial community structure. Conclusions: The superiority of CH in environmental control over FH indicates that improved techniques in environmental control and breeding management can greatly reduce farming air pollution and improve the health management of broiler houses.

Suggested Citation

  • Imran Khan & Wenxing Wang & Xiaobin Ye & Adamu Mani Isa & Muhammad Tariq Khan & Renna Sa & Lei Liu & Teng Ma & Hongfu Zhang, 2022. "Comparison of Bacterial Community Structure in PM2.5 within Broiler Houses under Different Rearing Systems in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-15, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1357-:d:733405
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1357/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1357/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1357-:d:733405. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.